RSMOX vs. WWNPX
RSMOX (Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund) and WWNPX (Kinetics Paradigm Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RSMOX returned 8.99%/yr vs 18.11%/yr for WWNPX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSMOX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.64%/yr for WWNPX.
Performance
RSMOX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSMOX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than WWNPX's 15.12% return. Over the past 10 years, RSMOX has underperformed WWNPX with an annualized return of 8.99%, while WWNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.11% annualized return.
RSMOX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- 1Y
- 13.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.99%
WWNPX
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- 15.12%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- -0.67%
- 3Y*
- 29.92%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- 18.11%
RSMOX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSMOX Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund | 9.91% | 6.26% | 23.99% | 17.91% | -34.69% | 3.85% | 34.51% | 28.06% | -7.57% | 20.87% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 15.12% | -14.61% | 88.34% | -16.97% | 29.18% | 38.14% | 3.38% | 30.47% | -5.24% | 28.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSMOX and WWNPX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1999 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RSMOX and WWNPX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSMOX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank
RSMOX
WWNPX
RSMOX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund (RSMOX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSMOX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.02 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | -0.08 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | -0.19 | +3.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSMOX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSMOX drawdown since its inception was -63.76%, smaller than the maximum WWNPX drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMOX and WWNPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSMOX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.76% | -67.87% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.78% | -27.71% | +14.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.67% | -41.13% | +12.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.51% | -41.13% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.51% | -43.51% | -9.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.57% | -30.22% | +14.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -13.93% | -4.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 11.99% | -8.32% |
Volatility
RSMOX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund (RSMOX) is 7.44%, while Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a volatility of 9.90%. This indicates that RSMOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSMOX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 9.90% | -2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.57% | 26.89% | -11.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.21% | 33.65% | -14.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.43% | 33.01% | -2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.53% | 28.70% | -2.17% |
RSMOX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSMOX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSMOX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison
RSMOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WWNPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSMOX Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 38.37% | 4.10% | 0.00% | 19.42% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 7.13% | 8.21% | 2.95% | 5.65% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.15% | 1.00% | 10.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSMOX and WWNPX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WWNPX has higher volatility (9.90%) compared to RSMOX (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSMOX dropped -63.76% vs WWNPX's -67.87%.
RSMOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSMOX and WWNPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer