RSMOX vs. NEEIX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RSMOX (Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund) and NEEIX (Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RSMOX returned 1.65%/yr vs 14.61%/yr for NEEIX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSMOX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for NEEIX.

Performance

RSMOX vs. NEEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund (RSMOX) and Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSMOX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than NEEIX's 57.02% return.

RSMOX

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 1.73%
• YTD: 9.91%
• 6M: 7.68%
• 1Y: 13.10%
• 3Y*: 15.25%
• 5Y*: 1.65%
• 10Y*: 8.99%

NEEIX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 3.54%
• YTD: 57.02%
• 6M: 53.72%
• 1Y: 84.03%
• 3Y*: 30.04%
• 5Y*: 14.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSMOX vs. NEEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSMOX Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund	9.91%	6.26%	23.99%	17.91%	-34.69%	3.85%	34.51%	28.06%	-7.57%	20.87%
NEEIX Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class	57.02%	9.32%	19.26%	27.30%	-33.26%	28.13%	42.39%	43.15%	-10.13%	8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between RSMOX and NEEIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.83

The correlation between RSMOX and NEEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RSMOX vs. NEEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSMOX

RSMOX Risk / Return Rank: 12
RSMOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
RSMOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
RSMOX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
RSMOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RSMOX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

NEEIX

NEEIX Risk / Return Rank: 91
NEEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
NEEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
NEEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
NEEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NEEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSMOX vs. NEEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund (RSMOX) and Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSMOX	NEEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	2.92	-2.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	3.42	-2.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.45	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	6.47	-5.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.30	21.42	-18.12

RSMOX vs. NEEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSMOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the NEEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSMOX and NEEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSMOX vs. NEEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSMOX drawdown since its inception was -63.76%, which is greater than NEEIX's maximum drawdown of -43.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMOX and NEEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSMOX	NEEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.76%	-43.11%	-20.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.78%	-13.22%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.67%	-36.13%	+7.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.51%	-43.11%	-9.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.57%	-5.13%	-10.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.90%	-10.81%	-8.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.67%	3.99%	-0.32%

Volatility

RSMOX vs. NEEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund (RSMOX) is 7.44%, while Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX) has a volatility of 14.06%. This indicates that RSMOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSMOX	NEEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.44%	14.06%	-6.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.57%	23.53%	-7.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.21%	29.38%	-10.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.43%	28.81%	+1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.53%	26.02%	+0.51%

RSMOX vs. NEEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSMOX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEIX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSMOX vs. NEEIX - Dividend Comparison

RSMOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NEEIX Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class	4.56%	7.16%	7.48%	0.00%	1.72%	6.70%	5.58%	11.09%	17.58%	9.64%
RSMOX Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.43%	38.37%	4.10%	0.00%	19.42%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSMOX and NEEIX in my portfolio?

RSMOX and NEEIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSMOX or NEEIX?

NEEIX has higher volatility (14.06%) compared to RSMOX (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSMOX dropped -63.76% vs NEEIX's -43.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.