RSMOX vs. BFGFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RSMOX (Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund) and BFGFX (Baron Focused Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RSMOX returned 8.69%/yr vs 20.74%/yr for BFGFX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSMOX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for BFGFX.

Performance

RSMOX vs. BFGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund (RSMOX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSMOX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than BFGFX's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RSMOX has underperformed BFGFX with an annualized return of 8.69%, while BFGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.74% annualized return.

RSMOX

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 4.95%
• YTD: 9.91%
• 6M: 8.34%
• 1Y: 14.32%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: 3.14%
• 10Y*: 8.69%

BFGFX

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 11.83%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: 20.17%
• 5Y*: 12.03%
• 10Y*: 20.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSMOX vs. BFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSMOX Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund	9.91%	6.26%	23.99%	17.91%	-34.69%	3.85%	34.51%	28.06%	-7.57%	20.87%
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund	0.47%	21.94%	29.52%	27.40%	-28.21%	18.67%	122.38%	30.05%	3.76%	26.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RSMOX and BFGFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2004	0.74

The correlation between RSMOX and BFGFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RSMOX vs. BFGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSMOX

RSMOX Risk / Return Rank: 12
RSMOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
RSMOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
RSMOX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
RSMOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RSMOX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

BFGFX

BFGFX Risk / Return Rank: 22
BFGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
BFGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BFGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BFGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
BFGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSMOX vs. BFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund (RSMOX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSMOX	BFGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	1.07	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	1.98	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.23	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	2.10	-0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.03	5.64	-1.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSMOX vs. BFGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSMOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the BFGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSMOX and BFGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSMOX	BFGFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	1.07	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.54	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	0.87	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.70	-0.32

Drawdowns

RSMOX vs. BFGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSMOX drawdown since its inception was -63.76%, which is greater than BFGFX's maximum drawdown of -59.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMOX and BFGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSMOX	BFGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.76%	-59.52%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.78%	-9.74%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.67%	-21.00%	-7.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.51%	-35.93%	-16.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.51%	-43.62%	-8.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.57%	-3.21%	-12.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.91%	-12.37%	-6.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.64%	3.62%	+0.02%

Volatility

RSMOX vs. BFGFX - Volatility Comparison

Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund (RSMOX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSMOX	BFGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.31%	5.29%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.34%	15.72%	-1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.22%	19.10%	-0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.30%	22.33%	+7.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.47%	23.99%	+2.48%

RSMOX vs. BFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSMOX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BFGFX's 1.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSMOX vs. BFGFX - Dividend Comparison

Neither RSMOX nor BFGFX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.28%	15.53%	2.85%	1.78%	1.07%	2.11%	6.02%	5.80%
RSMOX Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.43%	38.37%	4.10%	0.00%	19.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSMOX and BFGFX in my portfolio?

RSMOX and BFGFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSMOX or BFGFX?

RSMOX has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to BFGFX (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSMOX dropped -63.76% vs BFGFX's -59.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BFGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.