RSMC vs. PBW
RSMC (Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF) and PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. RSMC is actively managed, while PBW is passively managed. Over the past year, RSMC returned 18.15% vs 133.15% for PBW. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PBW.
Performance
RSMC vs. PBW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSMC achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than PBW's 12.69% return.
RSMC
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBW
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- 6.84%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- -0.67%
- 1Y
- 133.15%
- 3Y*
- -1.12%
- 5Y*
- -15.04%
- 10Y*
- 7.45%
RSMC vs. PBW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF | 6.73% | -1.02% | 0.68% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 12.69% | 53.96% | -2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSMC and PBW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between RSMC and PBW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSMC vs. PBW — Risk / Return Rank
RSMC
PBW
RSMC vs. PBW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSMC | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 3.39 | -2.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 3.69 | -2.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.44 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 6.84 | -4.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 19.02 | -13.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSMC | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 3.39 | -2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | -0.06 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
RSMC vs. PBW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSMC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum PBW drawdown of -89.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMC and PBW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSMC | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -89.02% | +66.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.49% | -21.24% | +10.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -84.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -71.60% | +70.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -62.88% | +57.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 7.64% | -4.16% |
Volatility
RSMC vs. PBW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) is 5.90%, while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a volatility of 11.40%. This indicates that RSMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSMC | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 11.40% | -5.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 31.19% | -17.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 39.77% | -22.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 42.91% | -22.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 38.52% | -17.71% |
RSMC vs. PBW - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PBW's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSMC vs. PBW - Dividend Comparison
RSMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 0.79% | 0.79% | 2.84% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 1.71% | 0.44% | 1.45% | 2.04% | 1.28% | 2.68% | 1.53% |