RSJN vs. IBIC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSJN (FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSJN is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. RSJN is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, RSJN returned 14.16% vs 4.14% for IBIC. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RSJN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

RSJN vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June (RSJN) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSJN achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.69% return.

RSJN

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.10%
• 6M: 7.16%
• YTD: 9.14%
• 1Y: 14.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.58%

IBIC

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: 2.39%
• YTD: 2.69%
• 1Y: 4.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	$1.04M	$835.24K	$534.47K
RSJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June	$380.62K	$3.27M	$1.24M

RSJN vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June	9.14%	7.86%	4.93%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.69%	4.96%	3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RSJN and IBIC is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024	-0.12

Return for Risk

RSJN vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSJN

RSJN Risk / Return Rank: 85
RSJN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
RSJN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
RSJN Omega Ratio Rank: 84
RSJN Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RSJN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSJN vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June (RSJN) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSJN	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	4.80	-2.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	8.57	-5.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	2.16	-0.79
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	15.99	-12.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.51	54.88	-41.37

RSJN vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSJN Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSJN and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSJN vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSJN drawdown since its inception was -12.44%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSJN and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSJN	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.44%	-0.90%	-11.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.07%	-0.27%	-3.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-0.06%	-0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-0.10%	-1.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.00%	0.08%	+0.92%

Volatility

RSJN vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June (RSJN) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.23%. This indicates that RSJN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSJN	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.74%	0.23%	+1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.96%	0.69%	+4.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.93%	0.89%	+6.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.89%	1.54%	+8.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.89%	1.54%	+8.35%

RSJN vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSJN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSJN vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

RSJN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	4.62%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%
RSJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSJN and IBIC in my portfolio?

RSJN and IBIC have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSJN or IBIC?

RSJN has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to IBIC (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSJN dropped -12.44% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, RSJN or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, RSJN leads with 14.16% vs 4.14% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSJN or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, RSJN has performed better with a 14.16% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSJN or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for RSJN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSJN or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.00% for RSJN.

What is the main difference between RSJN and IBIC?

RSJN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for RSJN and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.80 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.