RSJN vs. CMDT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RSJN (FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RSJN is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. RSJN is actively managed, while CMDT is passively managed. Over the past year, RSJN returned 13.77% vs 21.34% for CMDT. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSJN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.

Performance

RSJN vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June (RSJN) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSJN achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly lower than CMDT's 13.43% return.

RSJN

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 7.32%
• 6M: 6.90%
• 1Y: 13.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMDT

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -8.86%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 21.34%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSJN vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June	7.32%	7.86%	4.93%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	13.43%	12.78%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between RSJN and CMDT is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024	0.03

Return for Risk

RSJN vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSJN

RSJN Risk / Return Rank: 72
RSJN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
RSJN Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
RSJN Omega Ratio Rank: 69
RSJN Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RSJN Martin Ratio Rank: 77

CMDT

CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 50
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSJN vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June (RSJN) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSJN	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.71	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	2.39	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.29	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	1.93	+1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.38	9.62	+3.76

RSJN vs. CMDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSJN Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the CMDT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSJN and CMDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSJN vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSJN drawdown since its inception was -12.44%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSJN and CMDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSJN	CMDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.44%	-11.11%	-1.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.07%	-11.11%	+7.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-11.11%	+9.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.54%	-2.77%	+1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	2.25%	-1.22%

Volatility

RSJN vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June (RSJN) is 1.74%, while PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that RSJN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSJN	CMDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.74%	3.26%	-1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.00%	10.60%	-5.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.02%	12.65%	-5.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.08%	12.24%	-2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.08%	12.24%	-2.16%

RSJN vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSJN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSJN vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

RSJN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	2.67%	3.04%	8.80%	2.71%
RSJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSJN and CMDT in my portfolio?

RSJN and CMDT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSJN or CMDT?

CMDT has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to RSJN (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSJN dropped -12.44% vs CMDT's -11.11%.

Which ETF is better, RSJN or CMDT?

On 1-year performance, CMDT leads with 21.34% vs 13.77% for RSJN. On fees, CMDT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, RSJN has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSJN or CMDT?

Over the 1-year period, CMDT has performed better with a 21.34% return vs 13.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSJN or CMDT?

CMDT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for RSJN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSJN or CMDT?

CMDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.00% for RSJN.

What is the main difference between RSJN and CMDT?

RSJN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CMDT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for RSJN and 0.65% for CMDT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSJN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.