PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSIIX vs. CWFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSIIX vs. CWFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) and Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSIIX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than CWFIX's 1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, RSIIX has outperformed CWFIX with an annualized return of 5.27%, while CWFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.01% annualized return.


RSIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.81%
6M
2.34%
1Y
5.83%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
5.27%

CWFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.50%
6M
2.04%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*
4.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSIIX vs. CWFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSIIX
RiverPark Strategic Income Fund
1.81%6.04%8.44%9.59%-3.31%11.60%3.42%3.50%1.36%4.84%
CWFIX
Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund
1.50%6.99%5.78%7.80%-3.17%2.40%4.38%7.33%0.36%3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RSIIX and CWFIX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2014

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSIIX vs. CWFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSIIX
RSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CWFIX
CWFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CWFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CWFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSIIX vs. CWFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) and Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSIIXCWFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

2.08

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

5.07

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.60

27.36

-4.77

RSIIX vs. CWFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the CWFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSIIX and CWFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSIIXCWFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

3.84

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.05

1.42

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.84

1.30

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.68

1.12

+0.56

Drawdowns

RSIIX vs. CWFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSIIX drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, which is greater than CWFIX's maximum drawdown of -12.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSIIX and CWFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSIIXCWFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.55%

-12.41%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.79%

-1.13%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.79%

-1.37%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.61%

-6.36%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.55%

-12.41%

-3.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-0.86%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

0.21%

+0.05%

Volatility

RSIIX vs. CWFIX - Volatility Comparison

RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) has a higher volatility of 0.54% compared to Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX) at 0.43%. This indicates that RSIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSIIXCWFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

0.43%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

1.19%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

1.49%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.52%

2.76%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.88%

3.09%

-0.21%

RSIIX vs. CWFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSIIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CWFIX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSIIX vs. CWFIX - Dividend Comparison

RSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than CWFIX's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWFIX
Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund
5.15%5.17%5.09%4.41%3.17%2.79%3.38%3.60%3.24%2.82%3.79%3.32%
RSIIX
RiverPark Strategic Income Fund
7.41%7.75%7.67%7.61%6.58%5.12%5.77%4.84%4.59%4.98%5.10%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSIIX and CWFIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSIIX has higher volatility (0.54%) compared to CWFIX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSIIX dropped -15.55% vs CWFIX's -12.41%.

CWFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSIIX and CWFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer