RSHO vs. SPMD
RSHO (Tema American Reshoring ETF) and SPMD (SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. RSHO is actively managed, while SPMD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSHO returned 31.02%/yr vs 16.15%/yr for SPMD. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSHO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPMD.
Performance
RSHO vs. SPMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSHO achieves a 33.69% return, which is significantly higher than SPMD's 14.16% return.
RSHO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 33.69%
- 6M
- 33.85%
- 1Y
- 57.71%
- 3Y*
- 31.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMD
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
RSHO vs. SPMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 33.69% | 19.23% | 17.28% | 28.26% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 14.16% | 7.44% | 13.91% | 15.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSHO and SPMD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between RSHO and SPMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSHO vs. SPMD — Risk / Return Rank
RSHO
SPMD
RSHO vs. SPMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSHO | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.29 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 2.89 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.16 | 10.61 | +4.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSHO | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 1.65 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | 0.45 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
RSHO vs. SPMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSHO drawdown since its inception was -27.31%, smaller than the maximum SPMD drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSHO and SPMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSHO | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.31% | -57.62% | +30.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.64% | -8.86% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.31% | -24.08% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.08% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -8.12% | +3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 2.41% | +1.41% |
Volatility
RSHO vs. SPMD - Volatility Comparison
Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) at 4.38%. This indicates that RSHO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSHO | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | 4.38% | +4.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.09% | 11.37% | +8.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.74% | 15.57% | +8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 19.70% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 21.18% | +1.37% |
RSHO vs. SPMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSHO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMD's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSHO vs. SPMD - Dividend Comparison
RSHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than SPMD's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.26% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 1.23% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.24% | 1.30% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 5.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSHO and SPMD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSHO has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to SPMD (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSHO dropped -27.31% vs SPMD's -57.62%.
On 3-year performance, RSHO leads with 31.02% vs 16.15% for SPMD. On fees, SPMD is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RSHO has performed better with a 31.02% return vs 16.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMD is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSHO.
SPMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.22% for RSHO.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RSHO and 0.05% for SPMD.
RSHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSHO and SPMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer