PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSHO vs. PEXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSHO vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSHO achieves a 39.40% return, which is significantly higher than PEXL's 21.13% return.


RSHO

1D
0.00%
1M
5.76%
YTD
39.40%
6M
36.26%
1Y
61.78%
3Y*
30.96%
5Y*
10Y*

PEXL

1D
1.51%
1M
1.40%
YTD
21.13%
6M
19.71%
1Y
45.40%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSHO vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RSHO
Tema American Reshoring ETF
39.40%19.23%17.28%28.90%
PEXL
Pacer US Export Leaders ETF
21.13%27.33%5.79%16.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RSHO and PEXL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023

0.83

The correlation between RSHO and PEXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSHO vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSHO
PEXL

Industrials

74.2%
6.1%

Technology

11.8%
58.8%

Basic Materials

8.1%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
3.8%

Energy

0.9%
0.9%

Financial Services

0.8%

-

Communication Services

-

13.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.9%

Healthcare

-

6.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

RSHO
74.2%
PEXL
6.1%

Technology

RSHO
11.8%
PEXL
58.8%

Basic Materials

RSHO
8.1%
PEXL
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RSHO
3.7%
PEXL
3.8%

Energy

RSHO
0.9%
PEXL
0.9%

Financial Services

RSHO
0.8%
PEXL

-

Communication Services

RSHO

-

PEXL
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

RSHO

-

PEXL
5.9%

Healthcare

RSHO

-

PEXL
6.8%

Real Estate

RSHO

-

PEXL

-

Utilities

RSHO

-

PEXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSHO vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSHO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PEXL
PEXL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PEXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEXL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PEXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEXL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSHO vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSHOPEXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

3.99

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.97

16.43

+0.54

RSHO vs. PEXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSHO Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the PEXL Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSHO and PEXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSHO vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSHO drawdown since its inception was -27.31%, smaller than the maximum PEXL drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSHO and PEXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSHOPEXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.31%

-36.76%

+9.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.64%

-11.43%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.31%

-24.72%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.16%

+2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-6.69%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

2.77%

+1.06%

Volatility

RSHO vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison

Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) at 8.50%. This indicates that RSHO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSHOPEXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.26%

8.50%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.99%

14.94%

+6.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.93%

19.24%

+5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.82%

22.12%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.82%

24.12%

-1.30%

RSHO vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSHO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSHO vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison

RSHO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PEXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PEXL
Pacer US Export Leaders ETF
0.30%0.44%0.48%0.48%0.60%0.22%0.48%0.49%0.29%
RSHO
Tema American Reshoring ETF
0.21%0.30%0.26%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSHO and PEXL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSHO has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to PEXL (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSHO dropped -27.31% vs PEXL's -36.76%.

On 3-year performance, RSHO leads with 30.96% vs 20.97% for PEXL. On fees, PEXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PEXL has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RSHO has performed better with a 30.96% return vs 20.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSHO.

PEXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.21% for RSHO.

They also come from different issuers: Tema and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RSHO and 0.60% for PEXL.

RSHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSHO and PEXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer