RSHO vs. CTEF
RSHO (Tema American Reshoring ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSHO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.
Performance
RSHO vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSHO achieves a 33.69% return, which is significantly higher than CTEF's 29.35% return.
RSHO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 33.69%
- 6M
- 33.85%
- 1Y
- 57.71%
- 3Y*
- 31.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTEF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 29.35%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSHO vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 33.69% | 18.06% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 29.35% | 33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSHO and CTEF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSHO vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank
RSHO
CTEF
RSHO vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSHO | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.16 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSHO | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | 3.54 | -2.06 |
Drawdowns
RSHO vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSHO drawdown since its inception was -27.31%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSHO and CTEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSHO | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.31% | -15.00% | -12.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.41% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -1.80% | -2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | — | — |
Volatility
RSHO vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSHO | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.74% | 21.81% | +1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 21.81% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 21.81% | +0.74% |
RSHO vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSHO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSHO vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison
RSHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.26% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSHO and CTEF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSHO.
RSHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RSHO and 0.45% for CTEF.
Find the right allocation for RSHO and CTEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer