PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSG vs. ABBV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RSG vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSG achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than ABBV's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, RSG has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 17.46%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.10% annualized return.


RSG

1D
0.89%
1M
0.76%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
-15.54%
3Y*
14.95%
5Y*
15.35%
10Y*
17.46%

ABBV

1D
1.32%
1M
8.24%
YTD
1.30%
6M
3.65%
1Y
23.06%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
18.94%
10Y*
19.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSG vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
-0.38%6.44%23.03%29.64%-6.16%47.03%9.53%26.62%8.85%20.96%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
1.30%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%

Correlation

The correlation between RSG and ABBV is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.29

The correlation between RSG and ABBV shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RSG:

$64.88B

ABBV:

$403.99B

EPS

RSG:

$6.98

ABBV:

$2.05

PE Ratio

RSG:

30.07

ABBV:

110.96

PS Ratio

RSG:

3.91

ABBV:

6.43

PB Ratio

RSG:

5.42

ABBV:

14.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

RSG:

$16.70B

ABBV:

$62.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RSG:

$3.80B

ABBV:

$46.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

RSG:

$4.89B

ABBV:

$17.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSG vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSG
RSG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSG Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSG Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSG vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSGABBVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.18

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

1.29

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

2.88

-4.16

RSG vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSG Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSG and ABBV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSG vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSG drawdown since its inception was -65.99%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSG and ABBV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSGABBVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.99%

-45.09%

-20.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.44%

-17.32%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.54%

-20.74%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.54%

-21.92%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.02%

-45.09%

+11.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.77%

-4.60%

-13.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-10.71%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.50%

7.75%

+4.75%

Volatility

RSG vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) at 6.10%. This indicates that RSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSGABBVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

6.10%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.74%

17.85%

-4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.67%

24.31%

-5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.17%

22.89%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.08%

25.73%

-6.65%

Dividends

RSG vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

RSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than ABBV's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
2.96%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
1.17%1.12%0.82%1.25%1.48%1.27%1.72%1.74%2.00%1.97%2.17%2.64%

Financials

RSG vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Republic Services, Inc. and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
4.11B
15.00B
(RSG) Total Revenue
(ABBV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RSG vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Republic Services, Inc. and AbbVie Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
83.5%
Portfolio components
RSG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ABBV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

RSG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 830.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

ABBV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

RSG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a net income of 525.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

ABBV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RSG and ABBV have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSG has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to ABBV (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSG dropped -65.99% vs ABBV's -45.09%.

ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSG and ABBV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer