RSF vs. SDHY
RSF (RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund) and SDHY (PGIM Short Duration High Yield Opportunities Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, RSF returned 6.80%/yr vs 5.19%/yr for SDHY. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSF charges 6.38%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SDHY.
Performance
RSF vs. SDHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSF achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly higher than SDHY's -0.17% return.
RSF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 6.23%
- 1Y
- 11.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- —
SDHY
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.19%
- 10Y*
- —
RSF vs. SDHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSF RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund | 6.49% | 4.62% | 9.26% | 9.03% | -1.62% | 27.59% | 7.53% |
SDHY PGIM Short Duration High Yield Opportunities Fund | -0.17% | 10.37% | 16.68% | 11.40% | -13.33% | -3.05% | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSF and SDHY is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2020 | 0.20 |
The correlation between RSF and SDHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSF vs. SDHY — Risk / Return Rank
RSF
SDHY
RSF vs. SDHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) and PGIM Short Duration High Yield Opportunities Fund (SDHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSF | SDHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.16 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 0.99 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.77 | 2.85 | +5.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSF | SDHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 0.85 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.49 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.35 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
RSF vs. SDHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSF drawdown since its inception was -30.61%, which is greater than SDHY's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSF and SDHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSF | SDHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.61% | -22.65% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.92% | -6.29% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.15% | -9.24% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.02% | -22.28% | +12.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -2.70% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -6.70% | +2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 2.18% | -0.92% |
Volatility
RSF vs. SDHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) is 1.22%, while PGIM Short Duration High Yield Opportunities Fund (SDHY) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that RSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSF | SDHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 1.68% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.25% | 5.93% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.19% | 7.27% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.51% | 10.54% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.25% | 11.02% | +0.23% |
RSF vs. SDHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSF has a 6.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SDHY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSF vs. SDHY - Dividend Comparison
RSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.21%, more than SDHY's 8.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSF RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund | 11.21% | 11.30% | 10.87% | 10.85% | 11.78% | 9.52% | 11.76% | 6.92% | 8.21% | 9.22% | 1.41% |
SDHY PGIM Short Duration High Yield Opportunities Fund | 8.11% | 7.88% | 8.04% | 8.64% | 8.82% | 7.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSF and SDHY have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDHY has higher volatility (1.68%) compared to RSF (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSF dropped -30.61% vs SDHY's -22.65%.
RSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSF and SDHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer