RSF vs. SCFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX).
RSF is managed by RiverNorth. SCFIX is managed by Shenkman Funds. It was launched on Oct 31, 2012.
Performance
RSF vs. SCFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSF vs. SCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSF RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund | 4.23% | 4.62% | 9.26% | 9.03% | -1.62% | 27.59% | 3.10% | -12.10% | -1.41% | 5.37% |
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | -0.71% | 7.02% | 6.11% | 9.24% | -2.52% | 5.08% | 3.36% | 7.61% | 0.85% | 3.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSF achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly higher than SCFIX's -0.71% return.
RSF
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- 7.78%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- —
SCFIX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.24%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSF vs. SCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSF has a 6.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFIX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSF vs. SCFIX — Risk / Return Rank
RSF
SCFIX
RSF vs. SCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSF | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 2.54 | -1.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 3.61 | -2.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.62 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 3.04 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 15.57 | -11.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSF | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.54 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 1.58 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.29 | -0.86 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSF and SCFIX is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RSF vs. SCFIX - Dividend Comparison
RSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.21%, more than SCFIX's 5.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSF RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund | 11.21% | 11.30% | 10.87% | 10.85% | 11.78% | 9.52% | 11.76% | 6.92% | 8.21% | 9.22% | 1.41% | 0.00% |
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | 5.00% | 5.54% | 5.85% | 5.21% | 3.86% | 4.93% | 3.24% | 3.78% | 3.87% | 3.09% | 3.07% | 3.38% |
Drawdowns
RSF vs. SCFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSF drawdown since its inception was -30.61%, which is greater than SCFIX's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSF and SCFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSF | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.61% | -13.08% | -17.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.23% | -1.63% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.02% | -6.30% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -1.11% | -2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -0.52% | -4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 0.32% | +1.47% |
Volatility
RSF vs. SCFIX - Volatility Comparison
RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) at 0.79%. This indicates that RSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSF | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 0.79% | +5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.30% | 1.19% | +6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.07% | 1.96% | +7.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 2.92% | +7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.32% | 3.27% | +8.05% |