RSDGX vs. FAMVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Victory RS Select Growth Fund (RSDGX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX).
RSDGX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Aug 1, 1996. FAMVX is managed by FAM. It was launched on Jan 2, 1987.
Performance
RSDGX vs. FAMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSDGX vs. FAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSDGX Victory RS Select Growth Fund | -1.95% | 7.07% | 23.42% | 18.63% | -32.44% | 5.90% | 33.25% | 32.26% | -7.83% | 17.09% |
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | -1.31% | 4.90% | 15.51% | 16.09% | -14.06% | 25.65% | 6.81% | 30.31% | -6.15% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSDGX achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than FAMVX's -1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, RSDGX has underperformed FAMVX with an annualized return of 8.71%, while FAMVX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.72% annualized return.
RSDGX
- 1D
- 4.56%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 19.15%
- 3Y*
- 12.35%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
FAMVX
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSDGX vs. FAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSDGX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FAMVX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSDGX vs. FAMVX — Risk / Return Rank
RSDGX
FAMVX
RSDGX vs. FAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Select Growth Fund (RSDGX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSDGX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.26 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 0.51 | +0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.07 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 0.47 | +0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.24 | 1.65 | +3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSDGX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.26 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.38 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.54 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.58 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSDGX and FAMVX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RSDGX vs. FAMVX - Dividend Comparison
RSDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.80%, more than FAMVX's 4.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSDGX Victory RS Select Growth Fund | 13.80% | 13.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.07% | 28.89% | 17.43% | 13.19% | 46.71% | 14.65% | 3.30% | 9.40% |
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | 4.97% | 4.90% | 6.28% | 5.01% | 3.67% | 4.99% | 3.69% | 6.80% | 4.09% | 5.06% | 5.21% | 9.06% |
Drawdowns
RSDGX vs. FAMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSDGX drawdown since its inception was -74.21%, which is greater than FAMVX's maximum drawdown of -51.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSDGX and FAMVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSDGX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.21% | -51.12% | -23.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.51% | -11.38% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.14% | -22.77% | -27.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.14% | -37.73% | -12.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.71% | -7.14% | -11.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.28% | -6.45% | -21.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 3.25% | +0.36% |
Volatility
RSDGX vs. FAMVX - Volatility Comparison
Victory RS Select Growth Fund (RSDGX) has a higher volatility of 9.43% compared to FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) at 5.52%. This indicates that RSDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSDGX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.43% | 5.52% | +3.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.34% | 10.21% | +5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.58% | 17.91% | +6.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.47% | 17.08% | +12.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.06% | 18.15% | +7.91% |