RSDE vs. COMB

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

RSDE (FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSDE is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. RSDE is passively managed, while COMB is actively managed. Over the past year, RSDE returned 12.32% vs 25.91% for COMB. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. RSDE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.

Performance

RSDE vs. COMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December (RSDE) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSDE achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 17.53% return.

RSDE

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.37%
• 6M: 6.28%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 1Y: 12.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.59%
• 6M: 14.82%
• YTD: 17.53%
• 1Y: 25.91%
• 3Y*: 11.95%
• 5Y*: 9.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSDE vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSDE FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December	8.18%	8.96%	0.33%
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	17.53%	15.12%	1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between RSDE and COMB is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024	-0.01

Return for Risk

RSDE vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSDE

RSDE Risk / Return Rank: 58
RSDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RSDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RSDE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
RSDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
RSDE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

COMB

COMB Risk / Return Rank: 52
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 57
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSDE vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December (RSDE) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSDE	COMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.56	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.09	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.28	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	1.82	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.86	6.14	+2.72

RSDE vs. COMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the COMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSDE and COMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSDE vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSDE drawdown since its inception was -10.77%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSDE and COMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSDE	COMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.77%	-33.50%	+22.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.83%	-14.84%	+10.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-11.35%	+11.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.22%	-12.05%	+10.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.34%	4.40%	-3.06%

Volatility

RSDE vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December (RSDE) is 1.74%, while GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that RSDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSDE	COMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.74%	4.24%	-2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.92%	15.09%	-10.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.90%	17.38%	-9.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.77%	16.69%	-5.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.77%	15.15%	-4.38%

RSDE vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSDE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSDE vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison

RSDE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	7.70%	9.05%	2.48%	6.57%	30.85%	15.83%	0.07%	1.48%	0.97%	0.20%
RSDE FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSDE and COMB in my portfolio?

RSDE and COMB have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSDE or COMB?

COMB has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to RSDE (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSDE dropped -10.77% vs COMB's -33.50%.

Which ETF is better, RSDE or COMB?

On 1-year performance, COMB leads with 25.91% vs 12.32% for RSDE. On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RSDE has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSDE or COMB?

Over the 1-year period, COMB has performed better with a 25.91% return vs 12.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSDE or COMB?

COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for RSDE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSDE or COMB?

COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.70%, compared with 0.00% for RSDE.

What is the main difference between RSDE and COMB?

RSDE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for RSDE and 0.25% for COMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.