PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSBT vs. SSFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RSBT vs. SSFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF (SSFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSBT vs. SSFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
5.19%10.31%-2.90%-11.91%
SSFI
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF
-0.11%6.62%1.10%1.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly higher than SSFI's -0.11% return.


RSBT

1D
0.37%
1M
-4.56%
YTD
5.19%
6M
11.52%
1Y
14.67%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
10Y*

SSFI

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
0.72%
1Y
3.61%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSBT vs. SSFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SSFI's 0.81% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RSBT vs. SSFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBT
RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SSFI
SSFI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SSFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSFI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SSFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSFI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBT vs. SSFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF (SSFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSBTSSFIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

0.79

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

1.12

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.14

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.51

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.77

4.16

-0.39

RSBT vs. SSFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the SSFI Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBT and SSFI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSBTSSFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

0.79

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

-0.05

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between RSBT and SSFI is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RSBT vs. SSFI - Dividend Comparison

RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than SSFI's 3.38% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
3.04%3.20%0.00%2.38%0.00%0.00%
SSFI
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF
3.38%3.51%3.64%3.97%1.87%0.71%

Drawdowns

RSBT vs. SSFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, which is greater than SSFI's maximum drawdown of -16.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and SSFI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RSBTSSFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.60%

-16.07%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-2.61%

-5.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.56%

-2.57%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.22%

-7.78%

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

0.95%

+3.09%

Volatility

RSBT vs. SSFI - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF (SSFI) at 1.60%. This indicates that RSBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RSBTSSFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

1.60%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

2.67%

+8.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.95%

4.59%

+10.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

5.82%

+8.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.90%

5.82%

+8.08%