RSBT vs. JFLX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) and JFLX (JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSBT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for JFLX.

Performance

RSBT vs. JFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF (JFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly higher than JFLX's 2.31% return.

RSBT

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -2.71%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 6M: 4.48%
• 1Y: 22.95%
• 3Y*: 3.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JFLX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSBT vs. JFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	6.14%	6.56%
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF	2.31%	1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RSBT and JFLX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

RSBT vs. JFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBT

RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 58
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 53
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 59

JFLX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBT vs. JFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF (JFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSBT	JFLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	—	—

Drawdowns

RSBT vs. JFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, which is greater than JFLX's maximum drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and JFLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSBT	JFLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.60%	-2.36%	-21.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.08%	-0.08%	-4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.47%	-0.38%	-12.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSBT	JFLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.69%	2.66%	+12.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.83%	2.66%	+11.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.83%	2.66%	+11.17%

RSBT vs. JFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than JFLX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSBT vs. JFLX - Dividend Comparison

RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than JFLX's 3.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF	3.26%	1.27%	0.00%	0.00%
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	3.02%	3.20%	0.00%	2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSBT and JFLX in my portfolio?

RSBT and JFLX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RSBT or JFLX?

On fees, JFLX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSBT or JFLX?

JFLX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSBT or JFLX?

JFLX has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 3.02% for RSBT.

What is the main difference between RSBT and JFLX?

They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RSBT and 0.45% for JFLX.