RSBT vs. AVDV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSBT is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSBT returned 3.21%/yr vs 26.72%/yr for AVDV. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSBT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.

Performance

RSBT vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 14.99% return.

RSBT

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -3.00%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 23.51%
• 3Y*: 3.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVDV

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: 14.99%
• 6M: 17.18%
• 1Y: 41.91%
• 3Y*: 26.72%
• 5Y*: 13.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSBT vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	6.42%	10.31%	-2.90%	-11.85%
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF	14.99%	49.37%	8.67%	8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RSBT and AVDV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023	0.46

The correlation between RSBT and AVDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSBT vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSBT	AVDV
Financial Services	136.6%	13.7%
Basic Materials	-	22.5%
Communication Services	-	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	14.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.4%
Energy	-	10.8%
Healthcare	-	2.1%
Industrials	-	21.3%
Real Estate	-	1.1%
Technology	-	6.4%
Utilities	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

RSBT vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBT

RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 56
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 59

AVDV

AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 81
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBT vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSBT	AVDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.53	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	3.36	-1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.46	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	3.12	+0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.11	12.44	-3.33

RSBT vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBT Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBT and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSBT vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and AVDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSBT	AVDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.60%	-43.01%	+19.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.33%	-13.19%	+6.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.98%	-14.17%	-4.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.83%	-2.24%	-1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.55%	-6.76%	-5.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	3.30%	-0.85%

Volatility

RSBT vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) is 5.71%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that RSBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSBT	AVDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.71%	6.26%	-0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.07%	13.88%	-2.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.74%	16.25%	-1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.88%	17.41%	-3.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.88%	19.77%	-5.89%

RSBT vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSBT vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than AVDV's 4.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF	4.11%	3.05%	4.31%	3.29%	3.17%	2.39%	1.67%	0.36%
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	3.01%	3.20%	0.00%	2.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSBT and AVDV in my portfolio?

RSBT and AVDV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSBT or AVDV?

AVDV has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to RSBT (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBT dropped -23.60% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

Which ETF is better, RSBT or AVDV?

On 3-year performance, AVDV leads with 26.72% vs 3.21% for RSBT. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, RSBT has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSBT or AVDV?

Over the 3-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 26.72% return vs 3.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSBT or AVDV?

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSBT or AVDV?

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 3.01% for RSBT.

What is the main difference between RSBT and AVDV?

RSBT is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RSBT and 0.36% for AVDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.