RSBA vs. GOOX
RSBA (Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF) and GOOX (T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSBA returned 4.65% vs 274.80% for GOOX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSBA charges 0.96%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for GOOX.
Performance
RSBA vs. GOOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSBA achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly lower than GOOX's 18.83% return.
RSBA
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- -0.30%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- 18.83%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- 1Y
- 274.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSBA vs. GOOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSBA Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF | -0.30% | 7.73% | -0.04% |
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | 18.83% | 121.41% | -0.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSBA and GOOX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.09 |
The correlation between RSBA and GOOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSBA vs. GOOX — Risk / Return Rank
RSBA
GOOX
RSBA vs. GOOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSBA | GOOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.58 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 7.10 | -5.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.70 | 24.06 | -19.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSBA | GOOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 4.83 | -3.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 1.27 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
RSBA vs. GOOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum GOOX drawdown of -52.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBA and GOOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSBA | GOOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -52.46% | +49.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.74% | -38.98% | +36.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -21.02% | +19.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -17.04% | +16.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 11.48% | -10.49% |
Volatility
RSBA vs. GOOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA) is 1.37%, while T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) has a volatility of 16.21%. This indicates that RSBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSBA | GOOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 16.21% | -14.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.27% | 40.03% | -36.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 57.42% | -52.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.08% | 60.37% | -55.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.08% | 60.37% | -55.29% |
RSBA vs. GOOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSBA has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSBA vs. GOOX - Dividend Comparison
RSBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than GOOX's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | 0.26% | 0.30% | 16.78% |
RSBA Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF | 3.38% | 3.37% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSBA and GOOX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOX has higher volatility (16.21%) compared to RSBA (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBA dropped -2.83% vs GOOX's -52.46%.
On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 274.80% vs 4.65% for RSBA. On fees, RSBA is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, RSBA has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 274.80% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSBA is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GOOX.
RSBA has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.26% for GOOX.
They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for RSBA and 1.05% for GOOX.
GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSBA and GOOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer