PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSBA vs. GOOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSBA vs. GOOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBA achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly lower than GOOX's 18.83% return.


RSBA

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.15%
YTD
-0.30%
6M
-0.66%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOX

1D
-1.31%
1M
-13.31%
YTD
18.83%
6M
12.03%
1Y
274.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSBA vs. GOOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RSBA
Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF
-0.30%7.73%-0.04%
GOOX
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF
18.83%121.41%-0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RSBA and GOOX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.09

The correlation between RSBA and GOOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSBA vs. GOOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBA
RSBA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
RSBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBA Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBA Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOX
GOOX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBA vs. GOOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSBAGOOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.58

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

7.10

-5.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.70

24.06

-19.37

RSBA vs. GOOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBA Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the GOOX Sharpe Ratio of 4.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBA and GOOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSBAGOOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

4.83

-3.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

1.27

-0.27

Drawdowns

RSBA vs. GOOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum GOOX drawdown of -52.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBA and GOOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSBAGOOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.83%

-52.46%

+49.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-38.98%

+36.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-21.02%

+19.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.81%

-17.04%

+16.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

11.48%

-10.49%

Volatility

RSBA vs. GOOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA) is 1.37%, while T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) has a volatility of 16.21%. This indicates that RSBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSBAGOOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

16.21%

-14.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.27%

40.03%

-36.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.59%

57.42%

-52.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.08%

60.37%

-55.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.08%

60.37%

-55.29%

RSBA vs. GOOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBA has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSBA vs. GOOX - Dividend Comparison

RSBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than GOOX's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GOOX
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF
0.26%0.30%16.78%
RSBA
Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF
3.38%3.37%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSBA and GOOX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOX has higher volatility (16.21%) compared to RSBA (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBA dropped -2.83% vs GOOX's -52.46%.

On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 274.80% vs 4.65% for RSBA. On fees, RSBA is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, RSBA has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 274.80% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSBA is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GOOX.

RSBA has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.26% for GOOX.

They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for RSBA and 1.05% for GOOX.

GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSBA and GOOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer