RSBA vs. ADANX
RSBA (Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF) and ADANX (AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N) are both funds - RSBA is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while ADANX is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by AQR Funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSBA returned 4.65% vs 6.47% for ADANX. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. RSBA charges 0.96%/yr vs 2.12%/yr for ADANX.
Performance
RSBA vs. ADANX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSBA achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly lower than ADANX's 2.89% return.
RSBA
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- -0.30%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADANX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- 1Y
- 6.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.73%
- 10Y*
- 6.59%
RSBA vs. ADANX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSBA Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF | -0.30% | 7.73% | -0.04% |
ADANX AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N | 2.89% | 7.75% | 0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSBA and ADANX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSBA vs. ADANX — Risk / Return Rank
RSBA
ADANX
RSBA vs. ADANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA) and AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N (ADANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSBA | ADANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 4.57 | -3.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 7.88 | -6.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 2.13 | -0.95 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 16.47 | -14.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.70 | 45.54 | -40.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSBA | ADANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 4.57 | -3.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 1.15 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
RSBA vs. ADANX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum ADANX drawdown of -14.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBA and ADANX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSBA | ADANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -14.73% | +11.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.74% | -0.39% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -0.08% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -3.03% | +2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.14% | +0.85% |
Volatility
RSBA vs. ADANX - Volatility Comparison
Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N (ADANX) at 0.39%. This indicates that RSBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSBA | ADANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 0.39% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.27% | 1.07% | +2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 1.43% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.08% | 2.62% | +2.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.08% | 4.28% | +0.80% |
RSBA vs. ADANX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSBA has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than ADANX's 2.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSBA vs. ADANX - Dividend Comparison
RSBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than ADANX's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADANX AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N | 1.80% | 1.86% | 0.96% | 2.47% | 0.10% | 0.40% | 1.33% | 1.81% | 6.22% | 6.84% | 6.83% | 4.43% |
RSBA Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF | 3.38% | 3.37% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSBA and ADANX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSBA has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to ADANX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBA dropped -2.83% vs ADANX's -14.73%.
ADANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.57 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSBA and ADANX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer