RS2G.L vs. IDP6.L
RS2G.L (Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD) and IDP6.L (iShares S&P Small Cap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - RS2G.L tracks the Russell 2000 TR USD while IDP6.L tracks the iShares S&P Small Cap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RS2G.L returned 7.27%/yr vs 9.98%/yr for IDP6.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RS2G.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IDP6.L.
Performance
RS2G.L vs. IDP6.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RS2G.L is traded in GBp, while IDP6.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDP6.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RS2G.L having a 19.53% return and IDP6.L slightly higher at 19.67%. Over the past 10 years, RS2G.L has underperformed IDP6.L with an annualized return of 7.27%, while IDP6.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.98% annualized return.
RS2G.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 13.00%
- YTD
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 33.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- 7.27%
IDP6.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 14.54%
- YTD
- 19.67%
- 1Y
- 29.84%
- 3Y*
- 12.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.98%
RS2G.L vs. IDP6.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS2G.L Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD | 19.53% | 4.55% | 11.87% | 12.47% | -11.37% | 15.31% | 15.83% | 21.59% | -31.04% | 14.35% |
IDP6.L iShares S&P Small Cap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 19.67% | -1.29% | 8.98% | 11.50% | -6.83% | 27.55% | 7.33% | 16.71% | -4.42% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between RS2G.L and IDP6.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014 | 0.77 |
The correlation between RS2G.L and IDP6.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RS2G.L vs. IDP6.L — Risk / Return Rank
RS2G.L
IDP6.L
RS2G.L vs. IDP6.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD (RS2G.L) and iShares S&P Small Cap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDP6.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RS2G.L | IDP6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 4.54 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.19 | 14.12 | -2.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RS2G.L vs. IDP6.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RS2G.L drawdown since its inception was -45.11%, which is greater than IDP6.L's maximum drawdown of -39.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS2G.L and IDP6.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RS2G.L | IDP6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.11% | -39.21% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -7.19% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.04% | -30.39% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.04% | -30.39% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.11% | -39.21% | -5.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -3.72% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.48% | -8.04% | -3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.31% | +0.70% |
Volatility
RS2G.L vs. IDP6.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD (RS2G.L) and iShares S&P Small Cap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDP6.L) have volatilities of 4.85% and 4.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RS2G.L | IDP6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 4.64% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 12.17% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.25% | 16.63% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 20.19% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.32% | 21.25% | +3.07% |
RS2G.L vs. IDP6.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RS2G.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IDP6.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
RS2G.L vs. IDP6.L - Dividend Comparison
RS2G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDP6.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDP6.L iShares S&P Small Cap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.01% | 1.16% | 1.18% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.66% | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.01% | 0.72% | 0.87% | 0.56% |
RS2G.L Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RS2G.L and IDP6.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RS2G.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RS2G.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDP6.L.
RS2G.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while IDP6.L tracks iShares S&P Small Cap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RS2G.L and 0.40% for IDP6.L.
Find the right allocation for RS2G.L and IDP6.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer