RS2G.L vs. CUSS.L
RS2G.L (Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD) and CUSS.L (iShares MSCI USA Small Cap CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - RS2G.L tracks the Russell 2000 TR USD while CUSS.L tracks the MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced CTB Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RS2G.L returned 7.27%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for CUSS.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RS2G.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for CUSS.L.
Performance
RS2G.L vs. CUSS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RS2G.L is traded in GBp, while CUSS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CUSS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RS2G.L achieves a 19.53% return, which is significantly higher than CUSS.L's 16.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RS2G.L has underperformed CUSS.L with an annualized return of 7.27%, while CUSS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.58% annualized return.
RS2G.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 13.00%
- YTD
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 33.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- 7.27%
CUSS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- YTD
- 16.43%
- 1Y
- 28.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
RS2G.L vs. CUSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS2G.L Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD | 19.53% | 4.55% | 11.87% | 12.47% | -11.37% | 15.31% | 15.83% | 21.59% | -31.04% | 14.35% |
CUSS.L iShares MSCI USA Small Cap CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.43% | 2.30% | 11.72% | 11.84% | -7.30% | 19.67% | 15.07% | 21.58% | -5.62% | 6.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between RS2G.L and CUSS.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014 | 0.78 |
The correlation between RS2G.L and CUSS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RS2G.L vs. CUSS.L — Risk / Return Rank
RS2G.L
CUSS.L
RS2G.L vs. CUSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD (RS2G.L) and iShares MSCI USA Small Cap CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CUSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RS2G.L | CUSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.33 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 4.52 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.19 | 13.69 | -2.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RS2G.L vs. CUSS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RS2G.L drawdown since its inception was -45.11%, which is greater than CUSS.L's maximum drawdown of -35.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS2G.L and CUSS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RS2G.L | CUSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.11% | -35.69% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -6.87% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.04% | -29.20% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.04% | -29.20% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.11% | -35.69% | -9.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -4.86% | +1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.48% | -6.22% | -5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.27% | +0.74% |
Volatility
RS2G.L vs. CUSS.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD (RS2G.L) and iShares MSCI USA Small Cap CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CUSS.L) have volatilities of 4.85% and 4.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RS2G.L | CUSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 4.87% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 12.04% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.25% | 16.29% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 20.11% | +3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.32% | 20.42% | +3.90% |
RS2G.L vs. CUSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RS2G.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CUSS.L's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
RS2G.L vs. CUSS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RS2G.L nor CUSS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, RS2G.L and CUSS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, RS2G.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RS2G.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for CUSS.L.
RS2G.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while CUSS.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced CTB Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RS2G.L and 0.43% for CUSS.L.
Find the right allocation for RS2G.L and CUSS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer