PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRTL.DE vs. IMB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RRTL.DE vs. IMB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in RTL Group SA (RRTL.DE) and Imperial Brands plc (IMB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RRTL.DE is traded in EUR, while IMB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IMB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRTL.DE achieves a -6.39% return, which is significantly higher than IMB.L's -9.38% return. Over the past 10 years, RRTL.DE has underperformed IMB.L with an annualized return of -3.19%, while IMB.L has yielded a comparatively higher 2.69% annualized return.


RRTL.DE

1D
3.09%
1M
-3.35%
YTD
-6.39%
6M
-3.01%
1Y
-4.16%
3Y*
0.14%
5Y*
-1.01%
10Y*
-3.19%

IMB.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
-9.38%
6M
-14.25%
1Y
-1.60%
3Y*
24.01%
5Y*
19.20%
10Y*
2.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRTL.DE vs. IMB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RRTL.DE
RTL Group SA
-6.39%37.12%-17.56%-5.54%0.08%23.63%-9.64%-0.90%-26.84%0.90%
IMB.L
Imperial Brands plc
-9.37%22.86%58.98%-3.83%30.69%22.54%-17.28%-7.93%-20.61%-9.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RRTL.DE and IMB.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RTL Group SA

Imperial Brands plc

Return for Risk

RRTL.DE vs. IMB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRTL.DE
RRTL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
RRTL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRTL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRTL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RRTL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRTL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

IMB.L
IMB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IMB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IMB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRTL.DE vs. IMB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RTL Group SA (RRTL.DE) and Imperial Brands plc (IMB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RRTL.DEIMB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.00

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

-0.09

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.51

-0.23

-0.28

RRTL.DE vs. IMB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRTL.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the IMB.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRTL.DE and IMB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RRTL.DEIMB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

-0.08

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.97

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

0.11

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.27

-0.12

Drawdowns

RRTL.DE vs. IMB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRTL.DE drawdown since its inception was -74.06%, which is greater than IMB.L's maximum drawdown of -65.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRTL.DE and IMB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRTL.DEIMB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.06%

-65.48%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.80%

-17.25%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.69%

-17.25%

-17.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.28%

-22.65%

-21.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.11%

-64.89%

+4.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.17%

-15.88%

-20.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.48%

-22.46%

-6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.66%

6.96%

+1.70%

Volatility

RRTL.DE vs. IMB.L - Volatility Comparison

RTL Group SA (RRTL.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.48% compared to Imperial Brands plc (IMB.L) at 8.40%. This indicates that RRTL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRTL.DEIMB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.48%

8.40%

+3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.99%

16.29%

+5.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.26%

20.24%

+11.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.36%

19.72%

+6.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.58%

23.63%

+2.95%

Dividends

RRTL.DE vs. IMB.L - Dividend Comparison

RRTL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than IMB.L's 7.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMB.L
Imperial Brands plc
7.59%5.59%5.91%7.99%6.78%8.57%5.84%10.70%7.65%5.22%4.24%5.05%
RRTL.DE
RTL Group SA
2.04%6.17%8.75%8.51%20.22%5.47%0.00%5.80%7.28%5.07%4.88%3.86%

Financials

RRTL.DE vs. IMB.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RTL Group SA and Imperial Brands plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. RRTL.DE values in EUR, IMB.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


RRTL.DE and IMB.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRTL.DE and IMB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer