IMB.L vs. PH
Compare and contrast key facts about Imperial Brands plc (IMB.L) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH).
Performance
IMB.L vs. PH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMB.L vs. PH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMB.L Imperial Brands plc | -0.76% | 29.63% | 51.66% | -5.83% | 37.80% | 15.06% | -12.52% | -13.44% | -19.62% | -6.12% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 3.98% | 29.60% | 42.02% | 52.77% | 4.16% | 19.42% | 30.82% | 35.40% | -19.49% | 32.38% |
Different Trading Currencies
IMB.L is traded in GBp, while PH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PH values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
IMB.L:
£25.39B
PH:
$114.68B
IMB.L:
£5.64
PH:
$27.53
IMB.L:
5.42
PH:
32.52
IMB.L:
2.17
PH:
1.37
IMB.L:
0.68
PH:
5.62
IMB.L:
5.26
PH:
7.48
IMB.L:
£37.47B
PH:
$20.46B
IMB.L:
£13.60B
PH:
$7.63B
IMB.L:
£8.33B
PH:
$5.26B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMB.L achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than PH's 3.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IMB.L has underperformed PH with an annualized return of 4.68%, while PH has yielded a comparatively higher 25.98% annualized return.
IMB.L
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- 12.39%
- 3Y*
- 25.83%
- 5Y*
- 23.81%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
PH
- 1D
- 3.61%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 20.59%
- 1Y
- 45.22%
- 3Y*
- 37.00%
- 5Y*
- 25.89%
- 10Y*
- 25.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMB.L vs. PH — Risk / Return Rank
IMB.L
PH
IMB.L vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Brands plc (IMB.L) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMB.L | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 1.46 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.92 | 2.02 | -1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.31 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 2.75 | -1.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | 9.99 | -7.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMB.L | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 1.46 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 0.94 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.84 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.63 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMB.L and PH is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IMB.L vs. PH - Dividend Comparison
IMB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than PH's 0.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMB.L Imperial Brands plc | 5.24% | 5.59% | 5.91% | 7.99% | 6.78% | 8.57% | 5.84% | 10.70% | 7.65% | 5.22% | 4.24% | 5.05% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.80% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Drawdowns
IMB.L vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMB.L drawdown since its inception was -61.74%, which is greater than PH's maximum drawdown of -53.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMB.L and PH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMB.L | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.74% | -66.92% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.47% | -17.77% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.33% | -28.64% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.74% | -54.68% | -7.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.06% | -12.49% | +4.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.00% | -15.35% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 4.61% | +0.91% |
Volatility
IMB.L vs. PH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Imperial Brands plc (IMB.L) is 7.32%, while Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) has a volatility of 9.66%. This indicates that IMB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMB.L | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.32% | 9.66% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.26% | 17.78% | -3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 31.17% | -10.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 27.58% | -8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.73% | 30.98% | -8.25% |
Financials
IMB.L vs. PH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Brands plc and Parker-Hannifin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IMB.L vs. PH - Profitability Comparison
IMB.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Imperial Brands plc reported a gross profit of 3.68B and revenue of 10.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.93B and revenue of 5.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.
IMB.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Imperial Brands plc reported an operating income of 2.08B and revenue of 10.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.09B and revenue of 5.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
IMB.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Imperial Brands plc reported a net income of 1.26B and revenue of 10.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 845.00M and revenue of 5.17B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.