RRGIX vs. SCGSX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

RRGIX (DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund) and SCGSX (DWS Capital Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - RRGIX is a REIT fund managed by DWS, while SCGSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by DWS. Over the past 10 years, RRGIX returned 4.93%/yr vs 15.93%/yr for SCGSX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RRGIX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SCGSX.

Performance

RRGIX vs. SCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRGIX) and DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRGIX achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly higher than SCGSX's 6.52% return. Over the past 10 years, RRGIX has underperformed SCGSX with an annualized return of 4.93%, while SCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.93% annualized return.

RRGIX

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -3.03%
• YTD: 8.24%
• 6M: 8.39%
• 1Y: 12.27%
• 3Y*: 10.02%
• 5Y*: 1.89%
• 10Y*: 4.93%

SCGSX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 3.53%
• YTD: 6.52%
• 6M: 4.81%
• 1Y: 16.39%
• 3Y*: 19.87%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: 15.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRGIX vs. SCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RRGIX DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund	8.24%	8.77%	2.97%	11.22%	-26.42%	30.53%	-4.24%	25.09%	-4.15%	11.62%
SCGSX DWS Capital Growth Fund	6.52%	12.34%	26.27%	38.61%	-30.88%	22.41%	38.60%	36.98%	-1.96%	26.27%

Correlation

The correlation between RRGIX and SCGSX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007	0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between RRGIX and SCGSX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

RRGIX vs. SCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRGIX

RRGIX Risk / Return Rank: 16
RRGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
RRGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
RRGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
RRGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
RRGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

SCGSX

SCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 13
SCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
SCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
SCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRGIX vs. SCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRGIX) and DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RRGIX	SCGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	1.06	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	1.52	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.19	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	0.92	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.58	2.97	+1.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RRGIX vs. SCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the SCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRGIX and SCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RRGIX	SCGSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	1.06	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.53	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.78	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.42	-0.36

Drawdowns

RRGIX vs. SCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRGIX drawdown since its inception was -73.86%, which is greater than SCGSX's maximum drawdown of -50.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRGIX and SCGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RRGIX	SCGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.86%	-50.63%	-23.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.93%	-18.09%	+8.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.94%	-21.75%	+3.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.35%	-35.81%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.87%	-35.81%	-5.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.03%	-1.28%	-1.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.44%	-12.79%	-13.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	5.57%	-2.91%

Volatility

RRGIX vs. SCGSX - Volatility Comparison

DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRGIX) and DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RRGIX	SCGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	3.92%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.76%	12.33%	-3.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.55%	15.67%	-4.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.04%	20.82%	-4.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.09%	20.48%	-3.39%

RRGIX vs. SCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRGIX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than SCGSX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

RRGIX vs. SCGSX - Dividend Comparison

RRGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than SCGSX's 7.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RRGIX DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund	2.45%	2.65%	3.08%	1.39%	7.02%	8.80%	9.11%	16.41%	5.70%	3.74%	4.24%	4.31%
SCGSX DWS Capital Growth Fund	7.16%	7.62%	9.06%	7.18%	7.81%	6.64%	5.59%	5.98%	17.00%	9.08%	8.49%	11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RRGIX and SCGSX in my portfolio?

RRGIX and SCGSX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RRGIX or SCGSX?

SCGSX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to RRGIX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRGIX dropped -73.86% vs SCGSX's -50.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.