RRESX vs. RALVX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RRESX (Russell Investments Global Real Estate Securities Fund) and RALVX (Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - RRESX is a REIT fund managed by Russell, while RALVX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Russell. Over the past 10 years, RRESX returned 3.47%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for RALVX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RRESX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RALVX.

Performance

RRESX vs. RALVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRESX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRESX achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than RALVX's 9.28% return. Over the past 10 years, RRESX has underperformed RALVX with an annualized return of 3.47%, while RALVX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.43% annualized return.

RRESX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -1.44%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 7.89%
• 1Y: 10.22%
• 3Y*: 7.85%
• 5Y*: 0.82%
• 10Y*: 3.47%

RALVX

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: 9.28%
• 6M: 9.03%
• 1Y: 22.73%
• 3Y*: 14.96%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: 8.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRESX vs. RALVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RRESX Russell Investments Global Real Estate Securities Fund	7.39%	8.39%	1.08%	10.27%	-26.99%	26.80%	-5.53%	21.66%	-6.72%	11.51%
RALVX Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund	9.28%	17.44%	11.36%	17.18%	-16.76%	17.82%	6.13%	15.33%	-7.92%	13.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RRESX and RALVX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999	0.69

The correlation between RRESX and RALVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RRESX vs. RALVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRESX

RRESX Risk / Return Rank: 11
RRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
RRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
RRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
RRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
RRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

RALVX

RALVX Risk / Return Rank: 62
RALVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
RALVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
RALVX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
RALVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
RALVX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRESX vs. RALVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRESX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RRESX	RALVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	2.16	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	3.00	-1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.40	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	2.74	-1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.56	12.03	-8.47

RRESX vs. RALVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRESX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the RALVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRESX and RALVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RRESX vs. RALVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRESX drawdown since its inception was -72.09%, which is greater than RALVX's maximum drawdown of -59.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRESX and RALVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RRESX	RALVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.09%	-59.59%	-12.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.34%	-8.16%	-2.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.42%	-13.71%	-4.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.51%	-24.35%	-10.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.43%	-30.08%	-11.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.27%	-0.42%	-4.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.16%	-13.23%	+0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	1.86%	+0.94%

Volatility

RRESX vs. RALVX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRESX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX) have volatilities of 4.16% and 4.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RRESX	RALVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	4.04%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.41%	8.53%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.08%	10.36%	+1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.22%	13.27%	+2.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	13.71%	+3.78%

RRESX vs. RALVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRESX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than RALVX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RRESX vs. RALVX - Dividend Comparison

RRESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than RALVX's 10.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RALVX Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund	10.67%	11.68%	2.31%	1.21%	4.20%	17.98%	0.54%	6.24%	7.01%	5.99%	4.79%	1.23%
RRESX Russell Investments Global Real Estate Securities Fund	2.85%	3.32%	2.91%	2.12%	2.46%	6.40%	1.52%	7.15%	4.03%	7.92%	11.30%	7.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RRESX and RALVX in my portfolio?

RRESX and RALVX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RRESX or RALVX?

RRESX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to RALVX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRESX dropped -72.09% vs RALVX's -59.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RALVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.