PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRESX vs. MRESX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RRESX vs. MRESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRESX) and Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund (MRESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRESX achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than MRESX's 13.63% return.


RRESX

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
7.39%
6M
7.89%
1Y
10.22%
3Y*
7.85%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
3.47%

MRESX

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
13.63%
6M
13.98%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRESX vs. MRESX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RRESX
Russell Investments Global Real Estate Securities Fund
7.39%8.39%1.08%10.27%-26.99%26.80%-5.53%21.66%-6.72%7.37%
MRESX
Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund
13.63%0.87%7.09%11.77%-24.59%57.10%-2.46%28.85%-5.41%2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between RRESX and MRESX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2017

0.89

The correlation between RRESX and MRESX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRESX vs. MRESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRESX
RRESX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
RRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
RRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

MRESX
MRESX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRESX vs. MRESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRESX) and Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund (MRESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RRESXMRESXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.18

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

1.76

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

5.06

-1.50

RRESX vs. MRESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRESX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the MRESX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRESX and MRESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RRESX vs. MRESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRESX drawdown since its inception was -72.09%, which is greater than MRESX's maximum drawdown of -40.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRESX and MRESX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RRESXMRESXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.09%

-40.84%

-31.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

-7.92%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.42%

-17.29%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.51%

-32.98%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-2.89%

-2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.16%

-9.48%

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.65%

+0.15%

Volatility

RRESX vs. MRESX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Global Real Estate Securities Fund (RRESX) is 4.16%, while Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund (MRESX) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that RRESX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RRESXMRESXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

5.15%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

10.49%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

14.31%

-2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

20.67%

-4.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

22.03%

-4.54%

RRESX vs. MRESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RRESX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than MRESX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

RRESX vs. MRESX - Dividend Comparison

RRESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than MRESX's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRESX
Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund
1.41%1.49%2.40%2.01%6.49%14.54%2.19%10.71%3.24%10.34%0.00%0.00%
RRESX
Russell Investments Global Real Estate Securities Fund
2.85%3.32%2.91%2.12%2.46%6.40%1.52%7.15%4.03%7.92%11.30%7.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


RRESX and MRESX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRESX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to RRESX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRESX dropped -72.09% vs MRESX's -40.84%.

MRESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RRESX and MRESX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer