PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RQIIX vs. GRSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RQIIX vs. GRSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RESQ Strategic Income Fund (RQIIX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQIIX achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than GRSPX's 21.22% return. Over the past 10 years, RQIIX has underperformed GRSPX with an annualized return of -1.67%, while GRSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.30% annualized return.


RQIIX

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.05%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.63%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
-2.18%
5Y*
-4.48%
10Y*
-1.67%

GRSPX

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.75%
YTD
21.22%
6M
19.08%
1Y
27.02%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
10.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RQIIX vs. GRSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RQIIX
RESQ Strategic Income Fund
1.55%1.25%-5.13%-4.76%-10.09%-7.69%11.60%8.23%-13.25%4.14%
GRSPX
Greenspring Fund
21.22%6.12%16.03%11.95%-8.62%26.89%3.81%20.84%-10.21%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between RQIIX and GRSPX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.24

The correlation between RQIIX and GRSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (3 years) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RQIIX vs. GRSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RQIIX
RQIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RQIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RQIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GRSPX
GRSPX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GRSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GRSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RQIIX vs. GRSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RESQ Strategic Income Fund (RQIIX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RQIIXGRSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.34

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

3.75

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.59

12.05

-9.45

RQIIX vs. GRSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the GRSPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQIIX and GRSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RQIIXGRSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

1.92

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

0.69

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.15

0.68

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.14

0.70

-0.83

Drawdowns

RQIIX vs. GRSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQIIX drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, roughly equal to the maximum GRSPX drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQIIX and GRSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RQIIXGRSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.30%

-35.67%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-7.97%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-19.33%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.81%

-19.33%

-11.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.30%

-35.07%

+0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.58%

-0.30%

-24.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.10%

-4.81%

-8.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

2.39%

-0.54%

Volatility

RQIIX vs. GRSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RESQ Strategic Income Fund (RQIIX) is 1.01%, while Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that RQIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RQIIXGRSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

5.51%

-4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.38%

11.73%

-7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.75%

15.59%

-9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.02%

15.57%

-2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.96%

15.35%

-4.39%

RQIIX vs. GRSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RQIIX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GRSPX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

RQIIX vs. GRSPX - Dividend Comparison

RQIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than GRSPX's 7.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRSPX
Greenspring Fund
7.76%9.40%7.14%6.84%8.04%7.69%2.39%7.89%11.05%9.63%6.81%5.34%
RQIIX
RESQ Strategic Income Fund
2.35%2.55%2.87%1.90%1.02%0.00%0.40%0.78%1.23%1.00%0.21%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


RQIIX and GRSPX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRSPX has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to RQIIX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RQIIX dropped -34.30% vs GRSPX's -35.67%.

GRSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RQIIX and GRSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer