PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RQEIX vs. TEBRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RQEIX vs. TEBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) and Teberg Fund (TEBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQEIX achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly lower than TEBRX's 29.59% return. Over the past 10 years, RQEIX has underperformed TEBRX with an annualized return of 6.21%, while TEBRX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.20% annualized return.


RQEIX

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.77%
YTD
8.58%
6M
8.36%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
6.21%

TEBRX

1D
0.11%
1M
11.04%
YTD
29.59%
6M
28.81%
1Y
51.91%
3Y*
28.45%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
15.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RQEIX vs. TEBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RQEIX
RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund
8.58%14.97%15.35%20.27%-17.06%-8.45%14.11%7.53%-6.02%11.94%
TEBRX
Teberg Fund
29.59%18.67%20.76%34.92%-22.47%25.02%20.61%26.55%-6.70%15.25%

Correlation

The correlation between RQEIX and TEBRX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.63

The correlation between RQEIX and TEBRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RQEIX vs. TEBRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RQEIX
RQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
RQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TEBRX
TEBRX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
TEBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TEBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RQEIX vs. TEBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) and Teberg Fund (TEBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RQEIXTEBRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.58

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.75

5.27

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.53

23.39

-3.86

RQEIX vs. TEBRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQEIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is comparable to the TEBRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQEIX and TEBRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RQEIXTEBRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

3.30

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.82

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.81

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.59

-0.35

Drawdowns

RQEIX vs. TEBRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQEIX drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, smaller than the maximum TEBRX drawdown of -39.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQEIX and TEBRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RQEIXTEBRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.25%

-39.10%

+5.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

-9.95%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.96%

-18.50%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.96%

-30.35%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.25%

-32.22%

-1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-5.75%

-5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

2.24%

-0.91%

Volatility

RQEIX vs. TEBRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) is 3.50%, while Teberg Fund (TEBRX) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that RQEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RQEIXTEBRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

5.92%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.36%

12.70%

-7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.04%

15.90%

-7.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

19.99%

-3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.03%

18.76%

-2.73%

RQEIX vs. TEBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RQEIX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than TEBRX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RQEIX vs. TEBRX - Dividend Comparison

RQEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.64%, more than TEBRX's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RQEIX
RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund
13.64%14.53%0.38%0.00%0.38%0.00%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TEBRX
Teberg Fund
0.09%0.12%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.47%0.60%0.77%0.92%0.00%10.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


RQEIX and TEBRX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEBRX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to RQEIX (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RQEIX dropped -33.25% vs TEBRX's -39.10%.

TEBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 3.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RQEIX and TEBRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer