RQEIX vs. HSAFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RQEIX (RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund) and HSAFX (Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, RQEIX returned 4.59%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for HSAFX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RQEIX charges 1.80%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for HSAFX.

Performance

RQEIX vs. HSAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) and Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQEIX achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly higher than HSAFX's -1.40% return.

RQEIX

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 3.77%
• YTD: 8.58%
• 6M: 8.36%
• 1Y: 25.27%
• 3Y*: 16.31%
• 5Y*: 4.59%
• 10Y*: 6.21%

HSAFX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: -1.40%
• 6M: -0.92%
• 1Y: -0.78%
• 3Y*: 3.69%
• 5Y*: 1.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RQEIX vs. HSAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RQEIX RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund	8.58%	14.97%	15.35%	20.27%	-17.06%	-8.45%	14.11%	4.82%
HSAFX Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund	-1.40%	7.78%	1.74%	0.65%	4.42%	7.23%	11.20%	-0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between RQEIX and HSAFX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2019	0.25

The correlation between RQEIX and HSAFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RQEIX vs. HSAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RQEIX

RQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 94
RQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

HSAFX

HSAFX Risk / Return Rank: 2
HSAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
HSAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
HSAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
HSAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HSAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RQEIX vs. HSAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) and Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RQEIX	HSAFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.25	-0.09	+3.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.81	-0.08	+4.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	0.99	+0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.75	-0.09	+7.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.53	-0.25	+19.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RQEIX vs. HSAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQEIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the HSAFX Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQEIX and HSAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RQEIX	HSAFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25	-0.09	+3.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.38	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.89	-0.66

Drawdowns

RQEIX vs. HSAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQEIX drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, which is greater than HSAFX's maximum drawdown of -5.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQEIX and HSAFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RQEIX	HSAFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.25%	-5.54%	-27.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.36%	-5.34%	+1.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.96%	-5.34%	-12.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.96%	-5.54%	-27.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-3.66%	+3.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.27%	-1.57%	-9.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.33%	1.91%	-0.58%

Volatility

RQEIX vs. HSAFX - Volatility Comparison

RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) at 1.79%. This indicates that RQEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RQEIX	HSAFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	1.79%	+1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.36%	3.72%	+1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.04%	5.61%	+2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.73%	4.86%	+11.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.03%	5.12%	+10.91%

RQEIX vs. HSAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RQEIX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HSAFX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

RQEIX vs. HSAFX - Dividend Comparison

RQEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.64%, more than HSAFX's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HSAFX Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund	1.79%	1.90%	2.15%	1.60%	19.12%	3.37%	5.55%	0.03%
RQEIX RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund	13.64%	14.53%	0.38%	0.00%	0.38%	0.00%	0.23%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RQEIX and HSAFX in my portfolio?

RQEIX and HSAFX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RQEIX or HSAFX?

RQEIX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to HSAFX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RQEIX dropped -33.25% vs HSAFX's -5.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RQEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.