RQEIX vs. AFQSX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RQEIX (RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund) and AFQSX (Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, RQEIX returned 4.59%/yr vs 2.52%/yr for AFQSX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RQEIX charges 1.80%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for AFQSX.

Performance

RQEIX vs. AFQSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) and Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund (AFQSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQEIX achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly lower than AFQSX's 11.34% return.

RQEIX

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 3.77%
• YTD: 8.58%
• 6M: 8.36%
• 1Y: 25.27%
• 3Y*: 16.31%
• 5Y*: 4.59%
• 10Y*: 6.21%

AFQSX

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 4.39%
• YTD: 11.34%
• 6M: 13.11%
• 1Y: 22.99%
• 3Y*: 6.25%
• 5Y*: 2.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RQEIX vs. AFQSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RQEIX RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund	8.58%	14.97%	15.35%	20.27%	-17.06%	-8.45%	14.11%
AFQSX Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund	11.34%	3.78%	5.83%	2.10%	-22.23%	44.62%	-23.80%

Correlation

The correlation between RQEIX and AFQSX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.38

The correlation between RQEIX and AFQSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RQEIX vs. AFQSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RQEIX

RQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 94
RQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

AFQSX

AFQSX Risk / Return Rank: 74
AFQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
AFQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
AFQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AFQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AFQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RQEIX vs. AFQSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) and Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund (AFQSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RQEIX	AFQSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.25	2.30	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.81	3.51	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.52	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.75	3.84	+3.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.53	13.91	+5.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RQEIX vs. AFQSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQEIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the AFQSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQEIX and AFQSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RQEIX	AFQSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25	2.30	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.00	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.00	+0.23

Drawdowns

RQEIX vs. AFQSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQEIX drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, smaller than the maximum AFQSX drawdown of -93.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQEIX and AFQSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RQEIX	AFQSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.25%	-93.01%	+59.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.36%	-6.01%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.96%	-93.01%	+75.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.96%	-93.01%	+60.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-90.53%	+89.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.27%	-35.19%	+23.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.33%	1.66%	-0.33%

Volatility

RQEIX vs. AFQSX - Volatility Comparison

RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund (AFQSX) at 3.14%. This indicates that RQEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFQSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RQEIX	AFQSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	3.14%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.36%	8.46%	-3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.04%	10.05%	-2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.73%	637.17%	-620.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.03%	562.70%	-546.67%

RQEIX vs. AFQSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RQEIX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than AFQSX's 1.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

RQEIX vs. AFQSX - Dividend Comparison

RQEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.64%, while AFQSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AFQSX Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RQEIX RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund	13.64%	14.53%	0.38%	0.00%	0.38%	0.00%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RQEIX and AFQSX in my portfolio?

RQEIX and AFQSX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RQEIX or AFQSX?

RQEIX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to AFQSX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RQEIX dropped -33.25% vs AFQSX's -93.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RQEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.