PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPIFX vs. DBSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPIFX vs. DBSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) and Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPIFX achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly lower than DBSCX's 1.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RPIFX having a 4.83% annualized return and DBSCX not far behind at 4.59%.


RPIFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.76%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
4.83%

DBSCX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.07%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
4.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPIFX vs. DBSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
1.15%6.71%8.47%10.13%-1.96%4.67%2.42%8.82%0.39%3.78%
DBSCX
Doubleline Selective Credit Fund
1.99%8.46%7.78%8.55%-8.10%4.13%1.83%5.68%3.03%8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between RPIFX and DBSCX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.09

The correlation between RPIFX and DBSCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPIFX vs. DBSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPIFX
RPIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RPIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DBSCX
DBSCX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DBSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DBSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPIFX vs. DBSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) and Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPIFXDBSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

1.75

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

4.89

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.27

19.84

-5.57

RPIFX vs. DBSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the DBSCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPIFX and DBSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPIFX vs. DBSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPIFX drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, which is greater than DBSCX's maximum drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPIFX and DBSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPIFXDBSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.10%

-14.12%

-10.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-1.32%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.28%

-1.91%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.90%

-9.52%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.67%

-14.12%

-5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.13%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.33%

-1.24%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

0.32%

+0.07%

Volatility

RPIFX vs. DBSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) is 0.57%, while Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX) has a volatility of 0.65%. This indicates that RPIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPIFXDBSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

0.65%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.74%

1.54%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38%

2.01%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.76%

2.72%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.80%

2.91%

+0.89%

RPIFX vs. DBSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPIFX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than DBSCX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPIFX vs. DBSCX - Dividend Comparison

RPIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than DBSCX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBSCX
Doubleline Selective Credit Fund
6.55%6.50%7.09%6.77%6.67%4.68%4.64%6.04%7.43%9.01%9.73%9.53%
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
7.02%7.22%7.77%6.53%4.12%3.94%4.29%5.12%5.16%4.32%4.31%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPIFX and DBSCX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBSCX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to RPIFX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPIFX dropped -25.10% vs DBSCX's -14.12%.

DBSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPIFX and DBSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer