RPICX vs. PRDGX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Institutional International Disciplined Equity Fund (RPICX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX).

RPICX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jul 27, 2010. PRDGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 30, 1992.

Performance

RPICX vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional International Disciplined Equity Fund (RPICX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RPICX vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPICX T. Rowe Price Institutional International Disciplined Equity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.78%	17.23%	-10.26%	5.14%	4.57%	23.46%	-10.41%	21.67%
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.	-0.55%	14.74%	13.48%	13.68%	-10.22%	26.03%	13.92%	31.76%	-1.06%	18.89%

Returns By Period

RPICX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRDGX

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: -5.22%
• YTD: -0.55%
• 6M: 1.72%
• 1Y: 11.40%
• 3Y*: 13.02%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: 12.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPICX vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPICX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PRDGX's 0.62% expense ratio.

RPICX

T. Rowe Price Institutional International Disciplined Equity Fund

PRDGX

T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.

Return for Risk

RPICX vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRDGX

PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 40
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPICX vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional International Disciplined Equity Fund (RPICX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPICX	PRDGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.65	—

Correlation

The correlation between RPICX and PRDGX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RPICX vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison

RPICX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RPICX T. Rowe Price Institutional International Disciplined Equity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.48%	2.79%	0.84%	3.15%	2.70%	3.61%	19.04%	6.08%	1.68%	2.37%
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.	8.14%	8.02%	4.66%	2.78%	3.81%	2.00%	1.03%	2.33%	3.67%	1.82%	3.07%	7.57%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RPICX	PRDGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-49.79%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.50%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.44%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RPICX	PRDGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.09%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	14.08%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	15.87%	—