RPELX vs. APFPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RPELX (T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund) and APFPX (Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, RPELX returned 5.83%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for APFPX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPELX charges 0.56%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for APFPX.

Performance

RPELX vs. APFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPELX) and Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPELX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than APFPX's 4.00% return.

RPELX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 0.26%
• 1Y: 4.35%
• 3Y*: 5.83%
• 5Y*: 3.03%
• 10Y*: —

APFPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 4.00%
• 6M: 5.16%
• 1Y: 12.02%
• 3Y*: 9.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPELX vs. APFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RPELX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund	0.19%	7.13%	7.47%	2.92%	1.94%
APFPX Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund	4.00%	10.21%	11.33%	6.67%	6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between RPELX and APFPX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022	0.16

Return for Risk

RPELX vs. APFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPELX

RPELX Risk / Return Rank: 41
RPELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
RPELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
RPELX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
RPELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RPELX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

APFPX

APFPX Risk / Return Rank: 99
APFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
APFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
APFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
APFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPELX vs. APFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPELX) and Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPELX	APFPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	4.91	-3.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	7.19	-4.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	2.25	-0.94
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	13.50	-10.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.70	61.50	-52.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPELX vs. APFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the APFPX Sharpe Ratio of 4.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPELX and APFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPELX	APFPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	4.91	-3.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	3.54	-2.61

Drawdowns

RPELX vs. APFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPELX drawdown since its inception was -19.94%, which is greater than APFPX's maximum drawdown of -2.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPELX and APFPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPELX	APFPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.94%	-2.10%	-17.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.38%	-0.90%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.16%	-2.02%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-0.33%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-0.25%	-1.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.51%	0.20%	+0.31%

Volatility

RPELX vs. APFPX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPELX) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX) at 0.48%. This indicates that RPELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPELX	APFPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	0.48%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.58%	2.09%	+0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.18%	2.47%	+0.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.76%	2.76%	+1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.74%	2.76%	+1.98%

RPELX vs. APFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPELX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than APFPX's 1.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPELX vs. APFPX - Dividend Comparison

RPELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, more than APFPX's 4.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
APFPX Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund	4.59%	4.01%	6.18%	6.89%	8.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPELX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund	7.44%	7.49%	6.95%	4.90%	8.05%	5.39%	7.16%	4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPELX and APFPX in my portfolio?

RPELX and APFPX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPELX or APFPX?

RPELX has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to APFPX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPELX dropped -19.94% vs APFPX's -2.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.91 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.