ROSC vs. OSCV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. ROSC is passively managed, while OSCV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROSC returned 8.95%/yr vs 6.15%/yr for OSCV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROSC charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OSCV.

Performance

ROSC vs. OSCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROSC achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly higher than OSCV's 12.19% return.

ROSC

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 16.64%
• 6M: 14.85%
• 1Y: 34.90%
• 3Y*: 17.42%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: 11.36%

OSCV

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 6M: 10.21%
• 1Y: 16.60%
• 3Y*: 11.76%
• 5Y*: 6.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROSC vs. OSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF	16.64%	10.18%	7.28%	18.88%	-10.58%	31.37%	5.27%	17.09%	-13.17%
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	12.19%	1.35%	11.66%	10.14%	-11.41%	27.69%	4.94%	27.51%	-13.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ROSC and OSCV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018	0.90

The correlation between ROSC and OSCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROSC vs. OSCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROSC	OSCV
Healthcare	20.0%	8.6%
Financial Services	18.4%	27.7%
Consumer Cyclical	14.6%	10.7%
Technology	13.0%	2.2%
Industrials	11.0%	18.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	2.2%
Real Estate	5.6%	9.9%
Communication Services	3.5%	-
Energy	3.2%	11.3%
Basic Materials	2.6%	6.0%
Utilities	1.9%	3.1%

Return for Risk

ROSC vs. OSCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROSC

ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 79
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 80

OSCV

OSCV Risk / Return Rank: 41
OSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
OSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
OSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
OSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
OSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROSC vs. OSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROSC	OSCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	1.25	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	1.93	+1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.22	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.52	2.21	+2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.75	6.42	+8.33

ROSC vs. OSCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the OSCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROSC and OSCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROSC vs. OSCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROSC drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, roughly equal to the maximum OSCV drawdown of -42.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROSC and OSCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROSC	OSCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.13%	-42.40%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.75%	-7.55%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.74%	-22.92%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.74%	-22.92%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.04%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	-7.56%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	2.59%	-0.22%

Volatility

ROSC vs. OSCV - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) at 2.97%. This indicates that ROSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OSCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROSC	OSCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	2.97%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.40%	9.47%	+0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.53%	13.36%	+2.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.29%	17.22%	+2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.24%	20.85%	-0.61%

ROSC vs. OSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROSC has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than OSCV's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROSC vs. OSCV - Dividend Comparison

ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than OSCV's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	1.07%	1.23%	1.29%	1.55%	1.12%	1.06%	1.11%	1.75%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF	1.79%	2.08%	2.00%	2.01%	1.51%	2.13%	1.75%	3.05%	2.86%	2.13%	2.20%	2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROSC and OSCV in my portfolio?

ROSC and OSCV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROSC or OSCV?

ROSC has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to OSCV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROSC dropped -43.13% vs OSCV's -42.40%.

Which ETF is better, ROSC or OSCV?

On 5-year performance, ROSC leads with 8.95% vs 6.15% for OSCV. On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, OSCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROSC or OSCV?

Over the 5-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROSC or OSCV?

ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROSC or OSCV?

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.07% for OSCV.

What is the main difference between ROSC and OSCV?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ROSC and 0.79% for OSCV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.