PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROSC vs. HSMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROSC vs. HSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROSC achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly higher than HSMV's 3.11% return.


ROSC

1D
-0.88%
1M
0.50%
YTD
11.71%
6M
12.39%
1Y
30.49%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
10.48%

HSMV

1D
-0.50%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
3.11%
6M
3.06%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROSC vs. HSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
11.71%10.18%7.28%18.88%-10.58%31.37%56.61%
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
3.11%1.57%13.17%5.01%-9.44%23.72%34.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ROSC and HSMV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2020

0.88

The correlation between ROSC and HSMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ROSC vs. HSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROSC
HSMV

Healthcare

20.1%
4.9%

Financial Services

18.7%
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

14.1%
7.8%

Technology

12.1%
1.7%

Industrials

11.2%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
7.9%

Real Estate

5.5%
23.8%

Energy

3.8%
2.8%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.5%
5.4%

Utilities

1.9%
11.9%

Healthcare

ROSC
20.1%
HSMV
4.9%

Financial Services

ROSC
18.7%
HSMV
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ROSC
14.1%
HSMV
7.8%

Technology

ROSC
12.1%
HSMV
1.7%

Industrials

ROSC
11.2%
HSMV
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

ROSC
6.6%
HSMV
7.9%

Real Estate

ROSC
5.5%
HSMV
23.8%

Energy

ROSC
3.8%
HSMV
2.8%

Communication Services

ROSC
3.6%
HSMV
2.3%

Basic Materials

ROSC
2.5%
HSMV
5.4%

Utilities

ROSC
1.9%
HSMV
11.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROSC vs. HSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HSMV
HSMV Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROSC vs. HSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROSCHSMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

0.41

+1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.90

0.68

+2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.07

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

0.54

+3.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.81

1.62

+11.18

ROSC vs. HSMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the HSMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROSC and HSMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROSCHSMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

0.41

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.25

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.67

-0.21

Drawdowns

ROSC vs. HSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROSC drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, which is greater than HSMV's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROSC and HSMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROSCHSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.13%

-19.16%

-23.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-7.83%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.74%

-15.45%

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

-19.16%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-4.36%

+2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-5.62%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.59%

-0.20%

Volatility

ROSC vs. HSMV - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) at 2.85%. This indicates that ROSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROSCHSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

2.85%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

7.28%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

10.37%

+5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.32%

15.00%

+4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

16.06%

+4.22%

ROSC vs. HSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROSC has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than HSMV's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROSC vs. HSMV - Dividend Comparison

ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than HSMV's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
2.00%2.01%1.43%1.43%1.26%0.76%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.87%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROSC and HSMV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROSC has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to HSMV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROSC dropped -43.13% vs HSMV's -19.16%.

On 5-year performance, ROSC leads with 8.05% vs 3.69% for HSMV. On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, HSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 8.05% return vs 3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HSMV.

HSMV has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.87% for ROSC.

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ROSC and 0.80% for HSMV.

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROSC and HSMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer