PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROSC vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROSC vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROSC achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ROSC has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 10.48%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.


ROSC

1D
-0.88%
1M
0.50%
YTD
11.71%
6M
12.39%
1Y
30.49%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
10.48%

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROSC vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
11.71%10.18%7.28%18.88%-10.58%31.37%5.27%17.09%-12.38%24.49%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ROSC and DBO is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2015

0.20

The correlation between ROSC and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ROSC vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROSC
DBO

Healthcare

20.1%

-

Financial Services

18.7%
116.0%

Consumer Cyclical

14.1%

-

Technology

12.1%

-

Industrials

11.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.6%

-

Real Estate

5.5%

-

Energy

3.8%

-

Communication Services

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

2.5%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Healthcare

ROSC
20.1%
DBO

-

Financial Services

ROSC
18.7%
DBO
116.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ROSC
14.1%
DBO

-

Technology

ROSC
12.1%
DBO

-

Industrials

ROSC
11.2%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

ROSC
6.6%
DBO

-

Real Estate

ROSC
5.5%
DBO

-

Energy

ROSC
3.8%
DBO

-

Communication Services

ROSC
3.6%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

ROSC
2.5%
DBO

-

Utilities

ROSC
1.9%
DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROSC vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROSC vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROSCDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

4.44

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.81

9.02

+3.78

ROSC vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROSC and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROSCDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.34

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.50

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.36

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.02

+0.44

Drawdowns

ROSC vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROSC drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROSC and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROSCDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.13%

-90.18%

+47.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-18.19%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.74%

-28.20%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

-37.68%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

-61.69%

+18.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-51.38%

+49.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-62.25%

+55.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

8.92%

-6.53%

Volatility

ROSC vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) is 3.54%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that ROSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROSCDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

12.61%

-9.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

28.20%

-17.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

34.46%

-18.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.32%

32.29%

-12.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

31.78%

-11.50%

ROSC vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROSC has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROSC vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.87%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROSC and DBO have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to ROSC (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROSC dropped -43.13% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 11.37% vs 10.48% for ROSC. On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 10.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.87% for ROSC.

ROSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ROSC and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROSC and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer