ROKT vs. SUPL

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) and SUPL (ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - ROKT tracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index while SUPL tracks the FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ROKT returned 36.99%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for SUPL. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROKT charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SUPL.

Performance

ROKT vs. SUPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 29.72% return, which is significantly higher than SUPL's 19.48% return.

ROKT

• 1D: -2.22%
• 1M: -8.09%
• 6M: 13.55%
• YTD: 29.72%
• 1Y: 67.32%
• 3Y*: 36.99%
• 5Y*: 22.41%
• 10Y*: —

SUPL

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -1.13%
• 6M: 14.42%
• YTD: 19.48%
• 1Y: 25.17%
• 3Y*: 9.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROKT vs. SUPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	29.72%	50.56%	27.89%	14.41%	-3.15%
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF	19.48%	9.25%	-2.44%	23.69%	-11.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ROKT and SUPL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2022	0.62

The correlation between ROKT and SUPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ROKT vs. SUPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROKT	SUPL
Industrials	68.4%	58.3%
Technology	20.1%	1.8%
Communication Services	5.8%	-
Energy	5.7%	4.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	4.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

ROKT vs. SUPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROKT

ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 80
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

SUPL

SUPL Risk / Return Rank: 58
SUPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
SUPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SUPL Omega Ratio Rank: 57
SUPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SUPL Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROKT vs. SUPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROKT	SUPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	1.53	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	2.12	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.28	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	2.59	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.94	7.83	+4.12

ROKT vs. SUPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROKT Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the SUPL Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROKT and SUPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROKT vs. SUPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, which is greater than SUPL's maximum drawdown of -24.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and SUPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROKT	SUPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.16%	-24.42%	-18.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.30%	-9.76%	-9.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.46%	-21.71%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.30%	-1.13%	-18.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.85%	-5.88%	-0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.65%	3.23%	+2.42%

Volatility

ROKT vs. SUPL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a higher volatility of 10.83% compared to ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) at 5.37%. This indicates that ROKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROKT	SUPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.83%	5.37%	+5.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.34%	13.39%	+12.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.74%	16.53%	+15.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.47%	18.93%	+4.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.43%	18.93%	+6.50%

ROKT vs. SUPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SUPL's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROKT vs. SUPL - Dividend Comparison

ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than SUPL's 2.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	0.28%	0.41%	0.57%	0.62%	0.54%	1.79%	0.48%	0.74%	0.16%
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF	2.46%	3.03%	4.78%	4.71%	3.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROKT and SUPL in my portfolio?

ROKT and SUPL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROKT or SUPL?

ROKT has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to SUPL (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROKT dropped -43.16% vs SUPL's -24.42%.

Which ETF is better, ROKT or SUPL?

On 3-year performance, ROKT leads with 36.99% vs 9.76% for SUPL. On fees, ROKT is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SUPL has been the lower-risk option at 5.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROKT or SUPL?

Over the 3-year period, ROKT has performed better with a 36.99% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROKT or SUPL?

ROKT is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SUPL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROKT or SUPL?

SUPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.28% for ROKT.

What is the main difference between ROKT and SUPL?

ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while SUPL tracks FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ROKT and 0.58% for SUPL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.