ROKT vs. SATL

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while SATL (Satellogic V Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, ROKT returned 22.03%/yr vs -18.39%/yr for SATL. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ROKT vs. SATL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and Satellogic V Inc (SATL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 26.14% return, which is significantly lower than SATL's 90.91% return.

ROKT

• 1D: -2.70%
• 1M: -8.52%
• 6M: 6.03%
• YTD: 26.14%
• 1Y: 60.12%
• 3Y*: 35.19%
• 5Y*: 22.03%
• 10Y*: —

SATL

• 1D: -9.85%
• 1M: -41.86%
• 6M: 2.29%
• YTD: 90.91%
• 1Y: -4.03%
• 3Y*: 22.97%
• 5Y*: -18.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROKT vs. SATL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	26.14%	50.56%	27.89%	14.41%	-0.81%	1.13%
SATL Satellogic V Inc	90.91%	-34.39%	62.86%	-42.62%	-68.56%	-2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ROKT and SATL is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021	0.28

Over the past year, ROKT and SATL have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

ROKT vs. SATL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROKT

ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 70
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 69

SATL

SATL Risk / Return Rank: 48
SATL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SATL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SATL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SATL Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SATL Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROKT vs. SATL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and Satellogic V Inc (SATL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROKT	SATL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	-0.03	+1.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	0.92	+1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.11	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	-0.06	+2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.95	-0.11	+10.07

ROKT vs. SATL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROKT Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the SATL Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROKT and SATL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROKT vs. SATL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, smaller than the maximum SATL drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and SATL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROKT	SATL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.16%	-94.40%	+51.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.52%	-69.32%	+47.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.46%	-73.21%	+49.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.46%	-94.40%	+70.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.52%	-71.05%	+49.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.87%	-62.08%	+55.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.06%	35.35%	-29.29%

Volatility

ROKT vs. SATL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) is 7.36%, while Satellogic V Inc (SATL) has a volatility of 29.41%. This indicates that ROKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SATL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROKT	SATL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.36%	29.41%	-22.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.39%	96.32%	-69.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.80%	123.79%	-91.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.50%	107.69%	-84.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.43%	104.52%	-79.09%

Dividends

ROKT vs. SATL - Dividend Comparison

ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while SATL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	0.29%	0.41%	0.57%	0.62%	0.54%	1.79%	0.48%	0.74%	0.16%
SATL Satellogic V Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROKT and SATL in my portfolio?

ROKT and SATL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROKT or SATL?

SATL has higher volatility (29.41%) compared to ROKT (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROKT dropped -43.16% vs SATL's -94.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.