ROKT vs. MKOR

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) and MKOR (Matthews Korea Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROKT is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while MKOR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews. ROKT is passively managed, while MKOR is actively managed. Over the past year, ROKT returned 96.86% vs 180.86% for MKOR. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROKT charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for MKOR.

Performance

ROKT vs. MKOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 41.07% return, which is significantly lower than MKOR's 105.30% return.

ROKT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 41.07%
• 6M: 45.45%
• 1Y: 96.86%
• 3Y*: 41.32%
• 5Y*: 23.72%
• 10Y*: —

MKOR

• 1D: 5.43%
• 1M: 18.33%
• YTD: 105.30%
• 6M: 118.25%
• 1Y: 180.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROKT vs. MKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	41.07%	50.56%	27.89%	2.92%
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF	105.30%	70.33%	-15.76%	-2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ROKT and MKOR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2023	0.44

ROKT vs. MKOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROKT	MKOR
Industrials	68.4%	15.0%
Technology	20.1%	51.7%
Communication Services	5.8%	2.3%
Energy	5.7%	0.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.7%
Financial Services	-	9.6%
Healthcare	-	1.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

ROKT vs. MKOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROKT

ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 92
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

MKOR

MKOR Risk / Return Rank: 96
MKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
MKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
MKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROKT vs. MKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROKT	MKOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.14	4.52	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.74	4.40	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.64	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.38	8.83	-2.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.67	32.45	-6.78

ROKT vs. MKOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROKT Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is lower than the MKOR Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROKT and MKOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROKT vs. MKOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, which is greater than MKOR's maximum drawdown of -22.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and MKOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROKT	MKOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.16%	-22.09%	-21.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.27%	-20.62%	+5.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.23%	0.00%	-12.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.77%	-6.29%	-0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.79%	5.60%	-1.81%

Volatility

ROKT vs. MKOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) is 15.94%, while Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) has a volatility of 21.03%. This indicates that ROKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROKT	MKOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.94%	21.03%	-5.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.00%	37.01%	-10.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.03%	40.39%	-9.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.33%	28.54%	-5.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.42%	28.54%	-3.12%

ROKT vs. MKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MKOR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROKT vs. MKOR - Dividend Comparison

ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than MKOR's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF	1.28%	2.62%	5.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	0.28%	0.41%	0.57%	0.62%	0.54%	1.79%	0.48%	0.74%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROKT and MKOR in my portfolio?

ROKT and MKOR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROKT or MKOR?

MKOR has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to ROKT (15.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROKT dropped -43.16% vs MKOR's -22.09%.

Which ETF is better, ROKT or MKOR?

On 1-year performance, MKOR leads with 180.86% vs 96.86% for ROKT. On fees, ROKT is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ROKT has been the lower-risk option at 15.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROKT or MKOR?

Over the 1-year period, MKOR has performed better with a 180.86% return vs 96.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROKT or MKOR?

ROKT is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MKOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROKT or MKOR?

MKOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.28% for ROKT.

What is the main difference between ROKT and MKOR?

ROKT is categorized as Industrials Equities, while MKOR is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Matthews. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ROKT and 0.79% for MKOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 3.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.