PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROKT vs. KDEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ROKT vs. KDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ROKT vs. KDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly lower than KDEF's 20.17% return.


ROKT

1D
4.44%
1M
-4.02%
YTD
16.96%
6M
30.61%
1Y
87.29%
3Y*
35.37%
5Y*
20.32%
10Y*

KDEF

1D
2.65%
1M
-13.39%
YTD
20.17%
6M
11.40%
1Y
121.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ROKT vs. KDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than KDEF's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ROKT vs. KDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROKT
ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

KDEF
KDEF Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
KDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
KDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
KDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROKT vs. KDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROKTKDEFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.00

2.79

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.66

3.19

+0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.39

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.48

5.57

+0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.82

15.53

+9.29

ROKT vs. KDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROKT Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the KDEF Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROKT and KDEF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROKTKDEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

2.79

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

2.91

-2.16

Correlation

The correlation between ROKT and KDEF is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ROKT vs. KDEF - Dividend Comparison

ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than KDEF's 4.21% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
0.34%0.41%0.57%0.62%0.54%1.79%0.48%0.74%0.16%
KDEF
PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF
4.21%5.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ROKT vs. KDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, which is greater than KDEF's maximum drawdown of -22.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and KDEF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ROKTKDEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.16%

-22.51%

-20.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.36%

-22.51%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.46%

-18.37%

+10.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-5.83%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

8.08%

-4.59%

Volatility

ROKT vs. KDEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) is 10.58%, while PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) has a volatility of 19.32%. This indicates that ROKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ROKTKDEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.58%

19.32%

-8.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.67%

33.05%

-10.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.22%

43.92%

-14.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.87%

45.29%

-23.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.78%

45.29%

-20.51%