PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROKT vs. FIDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROKT vs. FIDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 46.55% return, which is significantly higher than FIDU's 14.93% return.


ROKT

1D
-3.71%
1M
12.62%
YTD
46.55%
6M
60.20%
1Y
111.37%
3Y*
44.75%
5Y*
24.68%
10Y*

FIDU

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.22%
YTD
14.93%
6M
15.53%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROKT vs. FIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
46.55%50.56%27.89%14.41%-0.81%4.63%7.99%40.90%-13.20%
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
14.93%18.61%16.51%22.62%-8.36%20.96%13.72%30.69%-9.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ROKT and FIDU is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.83

The correlation between ROKT and FIDU shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ROKT vs. FIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROKT
FIDU

Industrials

67.6%
92.1%

Technology

20.2%
6.4%

Energy

6.4%
0.0%

Communication Services

5.9%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.1%

Industrials

ROKT
67.6%
FIDU
92.1%

Technology

ROKT
20.2%
FIDU
6.4%

Energy

ROKT
6.4%
FIDU
0.0%

Communication Services

ROKT
5.9%
FIDU
0.0%

Basic Materials

ROKT

-

FIDU
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ROKT

-

FIDU
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

ROKT

-

FIDU

-

Financial Services

ROKT

-

FIDU
0.2%

Healthcare

ROKT

-

FIDU
0.0%

Real Estate

ROKT

-

FIDU

-

Utilities

ROKT

-

FIDU
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROKT vs. FIDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROKT
ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FIDU
FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROKT vs. FIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROKTFIDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.28

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.82

2.20

+7.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

35.81

9.09

+26.71

ROKT vs. FIDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROKT Sharpe Ratio is 3.88, which is higher than the FIDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROKT and FIDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROKTFIDUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88

1.64

+2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

0.70

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.66

+0.20

Drawdowns

ROKT vs. FIDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, roughly equal to the maximum FIDU drawdown of -42.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and FIDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROKTFIDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.16%

-42.31%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-12.23%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

-20.52%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

-22.87%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.82%

-1.27%

-7.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-4.81%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.96%

+0.16%

Volatility

ROKT vs. FIDU - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) at 5.27%. This indicates that ROKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROKTFIDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.10%

5.27%

+7.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.98%

13.52%

+11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.89%

16.50%

+12.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.78%

18.27%

+4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.14%

20.31%

+4.83%

ROKT vs. FIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDU's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROKT vs. FIDU - Dividend Comparison

ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than FIDU's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
0.95%1.02%1.42%1.42%1.48%1.12%1.28%1.73%1.99%1.60%1.63%1.98%
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
0.27%0.41%0.57%0.62%0.54%1.79%0.48%0.74%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROKT and FIDU have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROKT has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to FIDU (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROKT dropped -43.16% vs FIDU's -42.31%.

On 5-year performance, ROKT leads with 24.68% vs 12.80% for FIDU. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FIDU has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROKT has performed better with a 24.68% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ROKT.

FIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.27% for ROKT.

ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ROKT and 0.08% for FIDU.

ROKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROKT and FIDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer