ROGSX vs. LOGSX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ROGSX (Red Oak Technology Select Fund) and LOGSX (Live Oak Health Sciences Fund) are both mutual funds - ROGSX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Oak Associates, while LOGSX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by Oak Associates. Over the past 10 years, ROGSX returned 20.01%/yr vs 7.08%/yr for LOGSX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROGSX charges 0.92%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for LOGSX.

Performance

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) and Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROGSX achieves a 16.36% return, which is significantly higher than LOGSX's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ROGSX has outperformed LOGSX with an annualized return of 20.01%, while LOGSX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.

ROGSX

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 16.36%
• 6M: 15.07%
• 1Y: 37.98%
• 3Y*: 27.73%
• 5Y*: 15.36%
• 10Y*: 20.01%

LOGSX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 0.81%
• 6M: -0.39%
• 1Y: 17.95%
• 3Y*: 8.66%
• 5Y*: 5.93%
• 10Y*: 7.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROGSX Red Oak Technology Select Fund	16.36%	23.37%	24.87%	47.75%	-31.18%	25.16%	26.37%	34.36%	1.63%	31.10%
LOGSX Live Oak Health Sciences Fund	0.81%	19.63%	0.16%	1.21%	3.71%	17.59%	6.01%	18.98%	-3.84%	13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ROGSX and LOGSX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2001	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between ROGSX and LOGSX has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ROGSX vs. LOGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROGSX

ROGSX Risk / Return Rank: 48
ROGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ROGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ROGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ROGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
ROGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

LOGSX

LOGSX Risk / Return Rank: 26
LOGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
LOGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
LOGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
LOGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
LOGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) and Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROGSX	LOGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.24	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	1.85	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.22	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	2.22	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.17	5.46	+3.71

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROGSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the LOGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROGSX and LOGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROGSX drawdown since its inception was -92.96%, which is greater than LOGSX's maximum drawdown of -45.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROGSX and LOGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROGSX	LOGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.96%	-45.85%	-47.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.51%	-8.13%	-6.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.76%	-14.33%	-10.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.03%	-15.03%	-21.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.03%	-27.28%	-8.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.14%	-4.47%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.52%	-7.60%	-43.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.28%	3.31%	+0.97%

Volatility

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Volatility Comparison

Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) has a higher volatility of 8.18% compared to Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) at 5.20%. This indicates that ROGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROGSX	LOGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.18%	5.20%	+2.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.40%	10.42%	+4.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.72%	14.57%	+5.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.12%	14.26%	+8.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.58%	16.17%	+6.41%

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROGSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than LOGSX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Dividend Comparison

ROGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than LOGSX's 2.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LOGSX Live Oak Health Sciences Fund	2.06%	2.07%	2.64%	6.28%	0.55%	7.02%	7.04%	0.85%	15.20%	6.45%	2.10%	15.52%
ROGSX Red Oak Technology Select Fund	5.61%	6.53%	4.38%	4.24%	5.12%	10.80%	4.52%	2.67%	5.26%	6.93%	1.49%	4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROGSX and LOGSX in my portfolio?

ROGSX and LOGSX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROGSX or LOGSX?

ROGSX has higher volatility (8.18%) compared to LOGSX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROGSX dropped -92.96% vs LOGSX's -45.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.