PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROGSX vs. LOGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) and Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROGSX achieves a 21.39% return, which is significantly higher than LOGSX's -1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ROGSX has outperformed LOGSX with an annualized return of 20.15%, while LOGSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.49% annualized return.


ROGSX

1D
0.58%
1M
10.90%
YTD
21.39%
6M
20.15%
1Y
47.84%
3Y*
29.95%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
20.15%

LOGSX

1D
-1.70%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
-1.54%
1Y
14.66%
3Y*
8.28%
5Y*
6.02%
10Y*
6.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROGSX
Red Oak Technology Select Fund
21.39%23.37%24.87%47.75%-31.18%25.16%26.37%34.36%1.63%31.10%
LOGSX
Live Oak Health Sciences Fund
-1.95%19.63%0.16%1.21%3.71%17.59%6.01%18.98%-3.84%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ROGSX and LOGSX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2001

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between ROGSX and LOGSX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROGSX vs. LOGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROGSX
ROGSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ROGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ROGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

LOGSX
LOGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LOGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LOGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) and Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROGSXLOGSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.69

1.05

+1.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.33

1.57

+1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.19

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

1.84

+1.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.88

4.49

+7.39

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROGSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the LOGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROGSX and LOGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROGSXLOGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

1.05

+1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.43

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.40

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.43

-0.14

Drawdowns

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROGSX drawdown since its inception was -92.96%, which is greater than LOGSX's maximum drawdown of -45.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROGSX and LOGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROGSXLOGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.96%

-45.85%

-47.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.51%

-7.65%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-14.33%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.03%

-15.03%

-21.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.03%

-27.28%

-8.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.09%

+7.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.61%

-7.61%

-44.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

3.13%

+1.03%

Volatility

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Volatility Comparison

Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) at 3.57%. This indicates that ROGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROGSXLOGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

3.57%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.96%

10.02%

+3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.40%

14.02%

+4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

14.18%

+8.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.46%

16.13%

+6.33%

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROGSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than LOGSX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROGSX vs. LOGSX - Dividend Comparison

ROGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than LOGSX's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOGSX
Live Oak Health Sciences Fund
2.11%2.07%2.64%6.28%0.55%7.02%7.04%0.85%15.20%6.45%2.10%15.52%
ROGSX
Red Oak Technology Select Fund
5.38%6.53%4.38%4.24%5.12%10.80%4.52%2.67%5.26%6.93%1.49%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROGSX and LOGSX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROGSX has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to LOGSX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROGSX dropped -92.96% vs LOGSX's -45.85%.

ROGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROGSX and LOGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer