RODM vs. DFIC
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC).
RODM and DFIC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RODM is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2015. DFIC is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Mar 23, 2022.
Performance
RODM vs. DFIC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RODM vs. DFIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 6.61% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -11.51% |
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 3.32% | 37.09% | 4.10% | 17.32% | -9.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly higher than DFIC's 3.32% return.
RODM
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 31.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
DFIC
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 31.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RODM vs. DFIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIC's 0.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RODM vs. DFIC — Risk / Return Rank
RODM
DFIC
RODM vs. DFIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RODM | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.36 | 1.93 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.08 | 2.57 | +0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.40 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 2.75 | +0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.59 | 11.02 | +4.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RODM | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 1.93 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.74 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and DFIC is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RODM vs. DFIC - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than DFIC's 2.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.92% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.87% | 2.55% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RODM vs. DFIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, which is greater than DFIC's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and DFIC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RODM | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -24.40% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.40% | -11.00% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.11% | -7.56% | +3.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -4.64% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.74% | -0.76% |
Volatility
RODM vs. DFIC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 5.36%, while DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RODM | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 7.20% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 10.43% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 16.43% | -3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 16.19% | -2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 16.19% | -0.98% |