ROCQ vs. QQQA
ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) and QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. ROCQ is actively managed, while QQQA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ROCQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QQQA.
Performance
ROCQ vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ROCQ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QQQA
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -6.70%
- 6M
- 32.26%
- YTD
- 42.60%
- 1Y
- 60.80%
- 3Y*
- 24.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.36M | $3.63M | $3.95M | |
| $13.25M | $10.81M | $11.79M |
ROCQ vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 13.59% |
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 34.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROCQ and QQQA is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROCQ vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank
ROCQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQA
ROCQ vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROCQ | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.11 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROCQ vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROCQ drawdown since its inception was -8.05%, smaller than the maximum QQQA drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCQ and QQQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROCQ | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -38.44% | +30.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | -18.50% | +14.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -15.52% | +13.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.41% | — |
Volatility
ROCQ vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROCQ | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.01% | 33.64% | -13.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 27.45% | -7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 27.08% | -7.07% |
ROCQ vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROCQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROCQ vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison
ROCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than QQQA's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.03% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.10% |
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 3.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROCQ and QQQA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROCQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROCQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQQA.
ROCQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.03% for QQQA.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ROCQ and 0.58% for QQQA.
Find the right allocation for ROCQ and QQQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer