ROCQ vs. QMAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) and QMAR (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROCQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QMAR.

Performance

ROCQ vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ROCQ

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 6.49%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMAR

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 13.06%
• 6M: 14.01%
• 1Y: 23.38%
• 3Y*: 16.73%
• 5Y*: 12.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROCQ vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF	17.62%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	10.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ROCQ and QMAR is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026	0.93

Return for Risk

ROCQ vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMAR

QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 96
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROCQ vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROCQ	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	7.49	0.91	+6.58

Drawdowns

ROCQ vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROCQ drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, smaller than the maximum QMAR drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCQ and QMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROCQ	QMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.15%	-19.83%	+14.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.21%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.91%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.19%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.66%	-3.28%	+2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ROCQ	QMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.13%	6.09%	+10.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.13%	13.97%	+2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.13%	13.85%	+2.28%

ROCQ vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROCQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROCQ vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

ROCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	0.00%
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROCQ and QMAR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, ROCQ and QMAR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ROCQ or QMAR?

On fees, ROCQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROCQ or QMAR?

ROCQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROCQ or QMAR?

ROCQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.00% for QMAR.

What is the main difference between ROCQ and QMAR?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ROCQ and 0.90% for QMAR.