ROCQ vs. QMAR
ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) and QMAR (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. ROCQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QMAR.
Performance
ROCQ vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ROCQ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QMAR
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 18.52%
- 3Y*
- 14.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $319.00K | $316.44K | $452.98K | |
| $13.25M | $10.81M | $11.79M |
ROCQ vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 13.59% |
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March | 9.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROCQ and QMAR is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROCQ vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank
ROCQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QMAR
ROCQ vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROCQ | QMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.55 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 26.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROCQ vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROCQ drawdown since its inception was -8.05%, smaller than the maximum QMAR drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCQ and QMAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROCQ | QMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -19.83% | +11.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | -1.20% | -3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -3.22% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.68% | — |
Volatility
ROCQ vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROCQ | QMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.01% | 6.99% | +13.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 14.04% | +5.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 13.75% | +6.26% |
ROCQ vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROCQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROCQ vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison
ROCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% |
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 3.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, ROCQ and QMAR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ROCQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROCQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMAR.
ROCQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.00% for QMAR.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ROCQ and 0.90% for QMAR.
Find the right allocation for ROCQ and QMAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer