ROBNX vs. NMTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Robinson Tax Advantaged Income Fund (ROBNX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX).
ROBNX is managed by Liberty Street. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014. NMTRX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 30, 2007.
Performance
ROBNX vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROBNX vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBNX Robinson Tax Advantaged Income Fund | -0.21% | 2.89% | 8.89% | 3.06% | -8.79% | 9.27% | 0.71% | 15.11% | -6.19% | 4.99% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | -0.12% | 3.90% | 1.99% | 6.21% | -11.98% | 2.69% | 5.25% | 9.26% | 1.06% | 7.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBNX achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than NMTRX's -0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ROBNX has outperformed NMTRX with an annualized return of 2.45%, while NMTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.
ROBNX
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
NMTRX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROBNX vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBNX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ROBNX vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank
ROBNX
NMTRX
ROBNX vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinson Tax Advantaged Income Fund (ROBNX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROBNX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 0.84 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.82 | 1.16 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.23 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 0.99 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.60 | 2.89 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROBNX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 0.84 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.10 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.52 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.97 | -0.64 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBNX and NMTRX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ROBNX vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison
ROBNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than NMTRX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBNX Robinson Tax Advantaged Income Fund | 4.92% | 3.66% | 4.13% | 2.01% | 3.52% | 7.91% | 3.13% | 3.24% | 4.26% | 5.15% | 5.22% | 4.72% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | 4.19% | 4.46% | 3.55% | 3.67% | 3.28% | 2.73% | 2.92% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 3.28% | 3.71% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
ROBNX vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBNX drawdown since its inception was -27.51%, which is greater than NMTRX's maximum drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBNX and NMTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBNX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.51% | -16.36% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.61% | -4.75% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.50% | -16.36% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.51% | -16.36% | -11.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -2.25% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -2.93% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.62% | 0.00% |
Volatility
ROBNX vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison
Robinson Tax Advantaged Income Fund (ROBNX) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) at 1.07%. This indicates that ROBNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROBNX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 1.07% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.43% | 1.82% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.80% | 4.93% | +1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.73% | 3.97% | +2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.19% | 4.38% | +4.81% |