ROBG.L vs. BATT.L
ROBG.L (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF) and BATT.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBG.L is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index, while BATT.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROBG.L returned 8.16%/yr vs 17.44%/yr for BATT.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBG.L charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BATT.L.
Performance
ROBG.L vs. BATT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ROBG.L is traded in GBp, while BATT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BATT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBG.L achieves a 28.02% return, which is significantly lower than BATT.L's 35.72% return.
ROBG.L
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 9.31%
- YTD
- 28.02%
- 6M
- 25.47%
- 1Y
- 57.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
BATT.L
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 35.72%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 130.28%
- 3Y*
- 24.97%
- 5Y*
- 17.44%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBG.L vs. BATT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBG.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF | 28.02% | 14.68% | -0.04% | 18.36% | -25.90% | 17.05% | 40.88% | 25.34% | -22.40% |
BATT.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF | 35.72% | 59.22% | 0.53% | 3.36% | -3.98% | 16.77% | 76.00% | 12.15% | -17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBG.L and BATT.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2018 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ROBG.L and BATT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROBG.L vs. BATT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROBG.L
BATT.L
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ROBG.L
BATT.L
Technology
ROBG.L
BATT.L
Healthcare
ROBG.L
BATT.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
ROBG.L
BATT.L
Communication Services
ROBG.L
BATT.L
-
Basic Materials
ROBG.L
-
BATT.L
Consumer Defensive
ROBG.L
-
BATT.L
-
Energy
ROBG.L
-
BATT.L
-
Financial Services
ROBG.L
-
BATT.L
-
Real Estate
ROBG.L
-
BATT.L
-
Utilities
ROBG.L
-
BATT.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBG.L vs. BATT.L — Risk / Return Rank
ROBG.L
BATT.L
ROBG.L vs. BATT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROBG.L | BATT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.65 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 10.03 | -5.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.58 | 34.79 | -19.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROBG.L | BATT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 4.47 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.74 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.78 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
ROBG.L vs. BATT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.50%, roughly equal to the maximum BATT.L drawdown of -33.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBG.L and BATT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBG.L | BATT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.50% | -33.29% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.72% | -12.91% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.66% | -33.29% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.50% | -33.29% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -4.28% | +2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.33% | -8.89% | -1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 3.73% | -0.04% |
Volatility
ROBG.L vs. BATT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) is 7.77%, while L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that ROBG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBG.L | BATT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 10.87% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.14% | 22.93% | -6.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.97% | 28.95% | -7.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 23.60% | -3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 23.55% | -3.37% |
ROBG.L vs. BATT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBG.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BATT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBG.L vs. BATT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ROBG.L nor BATT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBG.L and BATT.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BATT.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BATT.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBG.L.
ROBG.L is categorized as Robotics, while BATT.L is Alternative Energy Equities. ROBG.L tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index, while BATT.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBG.L and 0.49% for BATT.L.
Find the right allocation for ROBG.L and BATT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer