PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBE.L vs. RBTX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBE.L vs. RBTX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ROBE.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ROBE.L is traded in EUR, while RBTX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RBTX.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBE.L achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly lower than RBTX.L's 22.36% return.


ROBE.L

1D
-2.83%
1M
-7.85%
6M
6.10%
YTD
14.99%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*
11.78%

RBTX.L

1D
-3.00%
1M
-7.85%
6M
15.05%
YTD
22.36%
1Y
27.60%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBE.L vs. RBTX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROBE.L
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
14.99%9.14%4.79%20.61%-29.75%25.18%33.46%31.56%-17.23%28.95%
RBTX.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
22.36%3.48%12.70%34.85%-30.34%30.22%27.74%40.95%-15.03%28.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBE.L and RBTX.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016

0.90

The correlation between ROBE.L and RBTX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBE.L vs. RBTX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBE.L
ROBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ROBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

RBTX.L
RBTX.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBE.L vs. RBTX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ROBE.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROBE.LRBTX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.20

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.11

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

6.08

+0.50

ROBE.L vs. RBTX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBE.L and RBTX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROBE.L vs. RBTX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBE.L drawdown since its inception was -36.18%, roughly equal to the maximum RBTX.L drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBE.L and RBTX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBE.LRBTX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.18%

-35.51%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-13.00%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.61%

-28.43%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.18%

-35.51%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.38%

-11.35%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-10.14%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

4.53%

-0.21%

Volatility

ROBE.L vs. RBTX.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ROBE.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) have volatilities of 10.13% and 10.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBE.LRBTX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.13%

10.42%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.06%

20.55%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.46%

24.72%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

26.33%

-3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

25.14%

-3.69%

ROBE.L vs. RBTX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBE.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than RBTX.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBE.L vs. RBTX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROBE.L nor RBTX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBE.L and RBTX.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RBTX.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RBTX.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBE.L.

ROBE.L tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS Index, while RBTX.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBE.L and 0.40% for RBTX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBE.L and RBTX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer