PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBE.L vs. LDGL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBE.L vs. LDGL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBE.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ROBE.L is traded in EUR, while LDGL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LDGL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


ROBE.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
-4.91%
6M
10.91%
YTD
18.25%
1Y
34.78%
3Y*
10.32%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
12.19%

LDGL.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.05%
6M
13.31%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBE.L vs. LDGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ROBE.L and LDGL.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBE.L vs. LDGL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBE.L
ROBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ROBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

LDGL.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBE.L vs. LDGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBE.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROBE.LLDGL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

ROBE.L vs. LDGL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROBE.L vs. LDGL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBE.L drawdown since its inception was -36.18%, which is greater than LDGL.L's maximum drawdown of -7.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBE.L and LDGL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBE.LLDGL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.18%

-7.52%

-28.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.89%

-0.03%

-9.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-1.64%

-9.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

Volatility

ROBE.L vs. LDGL.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBE.LLDGL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.31%

13.39%

+10.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.35%

13.39%

+8.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

13.39%

+8.04%

ROBE.L vs. LDGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBE.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than LDGL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBE.L vs. LDGL.L - Dividend Comparison

ROBE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDGL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ROBE.L and LDGL.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDGL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDGL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBE.L.

ROBE.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while LDGL.L is Global Equity Income. ROBE.L tracks L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF, while LDGL.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBE.L and 0.29% for LDGL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBE.L and LDGL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer